Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2] Add exclude for hash annotation #7151

Conversation

HenrikJannsen
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on #7150

@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen changed the title Add exclude for hash annotation [2] Add exclude for hash annotation Jun 8, 2024
…lements the handling of the excluded fields.
@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen force-pushed the add-ExcludeForHash-annotation branch from f0edd83 to d352f1f Compare June 8, 2024 08:01
@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 added this to the v1.9.16 milestone Jun 8, 2024
@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen dismissed alejandrogarcia83’s stale review June 8, 2024 21:31

The merge-base changed after approval.

Copy link
Contributor

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link
Contributor

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 dismissed their stale review June 8, 2024 21:35

The merge-base changed after approval.

Copy link
Contributor

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@alejandrogarcia83 alejandrogarcia83 merged commit 2acbd88 into bisq-network:master Jun 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@HenrikJannsen HenrikJannsen deleted the add-ExcludeForHash-annotation branch June 13, 2024 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants