Fix proof-of-burn signing for password protected wallets #4221
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add a missing bsqWalletService.isEncrypted() check and optional AES key argument to the signMessage(..) call in ProofOfBurnService, analogous to the BitcoinJ call to sign with an EC key in MyBlindVoteListService. This fixes bisq-network#3836.
sqrrm
approved these changes
May 5, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a missing
bsqWalletService.isEncrypted()check and optional AES key argument to thesignMessage(..)call inProofOfBurnService, analogous to the BitcoinJ call to sign with an EC key inMyBlindVoteListService.This fixes #3836 (Proof of burn signing does not work if wallet password is set).
--
Unfortunately this PR touches the core DAO packages again, although it is fairly trivial.