-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 487
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(useExplicitType): support explicit function argument types #4463
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ | ||||||||
use biome_analyze::{ | ||||||||
context::RuleContext, declare_lint_rule, Ast, Rule, RuleDiagnostic, RuleSource, | ||||||||
}; | ||||||||
use biome_console::markup; | ||||||||
use biome_console::{markup, MarkupBuf}; | ||||||||
use biome_js_semantic::HasClosureAstNode; | ||||||||
use biome_js_syntax::{ | ||||||||
AnyJsBinding, AnyJsExpression, AnyJsFunctionBody, AnyJsStatement, AnyTsType, JsCallExpression, | ||||||||
JsFileSource, JsFormalParameter, JsInitializerClause, JsLanguage, JsObjectExpression, | ||||||||
JsParenthesizedExpression, JsPropertyClassMember, JsPropertyObjectMember, JsStatementList, | ||||||||
JsSyntaxKind, JsVariableDeclarator, | ||||||||
JsParameters, JsParenthesizedExpression, JsPropertyClassMember, JsPropertyObjectMember, | ||||||||
JsStatementList, JsSyntaxKind, JsVariableDeclarator, | ||||||||
}; | ||||||||
use biome_js_syntax::{ | ||||||||
AnyJsFunction, JsGetterClassMember, JsGetterObjectMember, JsMethodClassMember, | ||||||||
|
@@ -16,16 +16,16 @@ use biome_js_syntax::{ | |||||||
use biome_rowan::{declare_node_union, AstNode, SyntaxNode, SyntaxNodeOptionExt, TextRange}; | ||||||||
|
||||||||
declare_lint_rule! { | ||||||||
/// Require explicit return types on functions and class methods. | ||||||||
/// Require explicit argument and return types on functions and class methods. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// Functions in TypeScript often don't need to be given an explicit return type annotation. | ||||||||
/// Leaving off the return type is less code to read or write and allows the compiler to infer it from the contents of the function. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// However, explicit return types do make it visually more clear what type is returned by a function. | ||||||||
/// However, explicit argument and return types make it visually more clear what types a function accepts and returns. | ||||||||
/// They can also speed up TypeScript type checking performance in large codebases with many large functions. | ||||||||
/// Explicit return types also reduce the chance of bugs by asserting the return type, and it avoids surprising "action at a distance," where changing the body of one function may cause failures inside another function. | ||||||||
/// Explicit types also reduce the chance of bugs by asserting both input and output types, and it avoids surprising "action at a distance," where changing the body of one function may cause failures inside another function. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// This rule enforces that functions do have an explicit return type annotation. | ||||||||
/// This rule enforces that functions have explicit type annotations for both their arguments and return type. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ## Examples | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
|
@@ -105,6 +105,32 @@ declare_lint_rule! { | |||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// The following pattern is considered incorrect code for missing an argument type on an function: | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts,expect_diagnostic | ||||||||
/// export function test(a: number, b): void { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts,expect_diagnostic | ||||||||
/// export const test = (a): void => { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts,expect_diagnostic | ||||||||
/// export default function test(a): void { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts,expect_diagnostic | ||||||||
/// export default (a): void => { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ### Valid | ||||||||
/// ```ts | ||||||||
/// // No return value should be expected (void) | ||||||||
|
@@ -115,8 +141,8 @@ declare_lint_rule! { | |||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts | ||||||||
/// // A return value of type number | ||||||||
/// var fn = function (): number { | ||||||||
/// return 1; | ||||||||
/// var fn = function (a: number): number { | ||||||||
/// return a + 1; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
|
@@ -202,22 +228,87 @@ declare_lint_rule! { | |||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// The following pattern is considered correct code because it includes both a return type and an argument type on an function: | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts | ||||||||
/// export function test(a: number, b: number): void { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts | ||||||||
/// export default function test(obj: {a: string}): void { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// ```ts | ||||||||
/// export default (a: SomeType): void => { | ||||||||
/// return; | ||||||||
/// } | ||||||||
/// ``` | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
pub UseExplicitType { | ||||||||
version: "1.9.3", | ||||||||
name: "useExplicitType", | ||||||||
language: "ts", | ||||||||
recommended: false, | ||||||||
sources: &[RuleSource::EslintTypeScript("explicit-function-return-type")], | ||||||||
sources: &[RuleSource::EslintTypeScript("explicit-function-return-type"), RuleSource::EslintTypeScript("explicit-module-boundary-types")], | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
declare_node_union! { | ||||||||
pub AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType = AnyJsFunction | JsMethodClassMember | JsMethodObjectMember | JsGetterClassMember | JsGetterObjectMember | ||||||||
pub AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters = AnyJsFunction | JsMethodClassMember | JsMethodObjectMember | JsGetterClassMember | JsGetterObjectMember | JsParameters | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
pub struct UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: TextRange, | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause, | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
enum UseExplicitTypeCause { | ||||||||
MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
MissingArgumentnType(String), | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Usually we try to avoid allocating a string. You could directly take the token:
Suggested change
In this case we could rewrite pub enum UseExplicitTypeState {
MissingReturnType(TextRange),
MissingArgumentnType(JsSyntaxToken),
} Because we can get the range from a token. |
||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
impl UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
fn title(&self) -> MarkupBuf { | ||||||||
match &self.cause { | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Missing return type on function."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingArgumentnType(name) => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Argument '"{name}"' should be typed."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
fn note_reason(&self) -> MarkupBuf { | ||||||||
match &self.cause { | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Declaring the return type makes the code self-documenting and can speed up TypeScript type checking."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingArgumentnType(_) => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Declaring the argument types makes the code self-documenting and can speed up TypeScript type checking."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
fn note_action(&self) -> MarkupBuf { | ||||||||
match &self.cause { | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Add a return type annotation."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingArgumentnType(_) => { | ||||||||
(markup! {"Add type annotations to the function arguments."}).to_owned() | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
impl Rule for UseExplicitType { | ||||||||
type Query = Ast<AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType>; | ||||||||
type State = TextRange; | ||||||||
type Query = Ast<AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters>; | ||||||||
type State = UseExplicitTypeState; | ||||||||
type Signals = Option<Self::State>; | ||||||||
type Options = (); | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
@@ -229,7 +320,7 @@ impl Rule for UseExplicitType { | |||||||
|
||||||||
let node = ctx.query(); | ||||||||
match node { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType::AnyJsFunction(func) => { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::AnyJsFunction(func) => { | ||||||||
if func.return_type_annotation().is_some() { | ||||||||
return None; | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
@@ -256,60 +347,71 @@ impl Rule for UseExplicitType { | |||||||
|
||||||||
let func_range = func.syntax().text_range(); | ||||||||
if let Ok(Some(AnyJsBinding::JsIdentifierBinding(id))) = func.id() { | ||||||||
return Some(TextRange::new( | ||||||||
func_range.start(), | ||||||||
id.syntax().text_range().end(), | ||||||||
)); | ||||||||
return Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: TextRange::new(func_range.start(), id.syntax().text_range().end()), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}); | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Some(func_range) | ||||||||
Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: func_range, | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType::JsMethodClassMember(method) => { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::JsMethodClassMember(method) => { | ||||||||
if method.return_type_annotation().is_some() { | ||||||||
return None; | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Some(method.node_text_range()) | ||||||||
Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: method.node_text_range(), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType::JsGetterClassMember(getter) => { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::JsGetterClassMember(getter) => { | ||||||||
if getter.return_type().is_some() { | ||||||||
return None; | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Some(getter.node_text_range()) | ||||||||
Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: getter.node_text_range(), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType::JsMethodObjectMember(method) => { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::JsMethodObjectMember(method) => { | ||||||||
if method.return_type_annotation().is_some() { | ||||||||
return None; | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Some(method.node_text_range()) | ||||||||
Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: method.node_text_range(), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnType::JsGetterObjectMember(getter) => { | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::JsGetterObjectMember(getter) => { | ||||||||
if getter.return_type().is_some() { | ||||||||
return None; | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Some(getter.node_text_range()) | ||||||||
Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: getter.node_text_range(), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingReturnType, | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
AnyJsFunctionWithReturnTypeOrJsParameters::JsParameters(params) => { | ||||||||
if let Some(params_diagnostic) = check_function_parameters_type(params) { | ||||||||
return Some(params_diagnostic); | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
None | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
fn diagnostic(_: &RuleContext<Self>, state: &Self::State) -> Option<RuleDiagnostic> { | ||||||||
Some( | ||||||||
RuleDiagnostic::new( | ||||||||
rule_category!(), | ||||||||
state, | ||||||||
markup! { | ||||||||
"Missing return type on function." | ||||||||
}, | ||||||||
) | ||||||||
.note(markup! { | ||||||||
"Declaring the return type makes the code self-documenting and can speed up TypeScript type checking." | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
.note(markup! { | ||||||||
"Add a return type annotation." | ||||||||
}), | ||||||||
RuleDiagnostic::new(rule_category!(), state.range, state.title()) | ||||||||
.note(state.note_reason()) | ||||||||
.note(state.note_action()), | ||||||||
) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
@@ -550,3 +652,32 @@ fn is_type_assertion(syntax: &SyntaxNode<JsLanguage>) -> bool { | |||||||
} | ||||||||
}) | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
|
||||||||
/// Checks if all parameters in a function have explicit type annotations. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// This function iterates over the provided function parameters and examines each one | ||||||||
/// to determine if it has a type annotation. If any parameter is missing a type annotation, | ||||||||
/// the function returns a `Some(UseExplicitTypeState)` indicating the range of the parameter | ||||||||
/// and the cause of the issue. If all parameters have type annotations, it returns `None`. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// # Arguments | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// * `parameters` - A reference to a `JsParameters` object representing the parameters of a function. | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// # Returns | ||||||||
/// | ||||||||
/// * `Option<UseExplicitTypeState>` - `Some(UseExplicitTypeState)` if a parameter is missing a type annotation, | ||||||||
/// or `None` if all parameters have explicit type annotations. | ||||||||
fn check_function_parameters_type(parameters: &JsParameters) -> Option<UseExplicitTypeState> { | ||||||||
for p in parameters.items() { | ||||||||
let param = p.ok()?; | ||||||||
Comment on lines
+672
to
+673
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We could avoid returning as soon as we met an error by iterating only over node without errors:
Suggested change
|
||||||||
let formal_param = param.as_any_js_formal_parameter()?; | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We should certainly handle the other parameter kinds (rest parameter and |
||||||||
if formal_param.type_annotation().is_none() { | ||||||||
return Some(UseExplicitTypeState { | ||||||||
range: formal_param.range(), | ||||||||
cause: UseExplicitTypeCause::MissingArgumentnType(formal_param.text()), | ||||||||
}); | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
} | ||||||||
None | ||||||||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've just noticed that some types are missing for checking if the return type is explicitly set:
TsMethodSignatureTypeMember
TsCallSignatureTypeMember
TsMethodSignatureClassMember
TsSetterSignatureClassMember
TsDeclareFunctionDeclaration
TsDeclareFunctionExportDefaultDeclaration
I wonder if directly matching against
JsParameters
is a good idea. I see two possible alternative approaches:JsFormalParameter
,JsRestParameter
, andTsThisParameter
Personally I could choose (2) because this allows us to issue a single diagnostic when a parameter or a return type is absent on a function.
Also, similarly to return type, we should ignore callbacks.
Besides, we should think to a better name for this union because we will have to add properties and top-level variables. Maybe
AnyJsTypeableEntity
? Have you a better suggestion?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review, and apologies for the late response.
I understand. I'll create a separate for this this.
I see your point. I'll revisit this after implementing the missing return types.
AnyJsTypeableEntity looks good to me.
For now, I will make this PR draft.