Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Match feature table and ordination #237
Match feature table and ordination #237
Changes from 6 commits
b51c5ff
6ab002e
ba68daf
3b86534
478710e
2ec2d6e
ca353cb
a6308ea
2a7c492
41fc8ae
75cfdda
c7d1abc
96d7944
30e8514
733bf62
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
something i just thought of (sorry for not bringing this up earlier), but since the table.qza file is changed in this PR the README should be updated to match that, right? i.e. the "view"/download links should be altered at least (preferably with a sentence or 2 of explaining which table from the MP tutorial this is)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it'd be clearer to replace
if extra and not filter_extra_samples:
with just anif extra:
check, and then below thatif not filter_extra_samples:
andelse:
branches that handle the two branches here. I think this would make program flow a bit clearer, sinceextra
has to be truthy in both cases?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call!