Match feature table to ordination #204
Comments
|
Can this be done before porting to JS? If so, I already have a function
that does this
https://github.com/biocore/gneiss/blob/master/gneiss/util.py#L171
…On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 1:00 PM Yoshiki Vázquez Baeza < ***@***.***> wrote:
The samples represented in the feature table should be the same as in the
ordination. This will help with matching colors, etc.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#204>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA75VXPBA67SH3BYX57NK2TRYJEONANCNFSM4OHCYO4A>
.
|
|
Yes, thanks for the heads up! |
ElDeveloper
added a commit
to ElDeveloper/empress
that referenced
this issue
Jul 8, 2020
This would otherwise lead to situations where mismatching categories would be displayed in the ordination and phylogeny. In principle users should use the rarefied table that was used for generating the ordination i.e. samples should have a 1:1 match. Fixes biocore#204
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The samples represented in the feature table should be the same as in the ordination. This will help with matching colors, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: