Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RM] wasAttributedTo #62

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021
Merged

[RM] wasAttributedTo #62

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2021

Conversation

remiadon
Copy link
Contributor

@remiadon remiadon commented Jun 18, 2021

"wasAttributedTo" contains duplicate informations w.r.t wasGeneratedBy + wasAssociatedWith

Plus we already removed it from our SPM parser, as the resulting graph was visually not interpretable

removing it

@cmaumet
Copy link
Collaborator

cmaumet commented Jun 18, 2021

Great! Thanks!

@cmaumet
Copy link
Collaborator

cmaumet commented Jun 18, 2021

Happy to merge this! Just one thing: @remiadon do you know why the spm test is failing?

@remiadon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmaumet just fixed the SPM test

Here is the line that caused the bug

matlabbatch{1}.spm.stats.factorial_design.des.t1.scans = {
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-01/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-02/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-03/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-04/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-05/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-06/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-07/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-08/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-09/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-10/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-11/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-12/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-13/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          '/storage/essicd/data/NIDM-Ex/BIDS_Data/RESULTS/EXAMPLES/ds011/SPM/LEVEL1/sub-14/con_0001.nii,1'
                                                          };

As you can see the value is defined on multiple lines, and we don't handle multi-lines definitions for now

I'll raise an issue

@remiadon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmaumet now ready to merge

@cmaumet cmaumet merged commit 8ece8a5 into master Jun 18, 2021
@cmaumet cmaumet deleted the remove_wasAttributedTo branch June 18, 2021 12:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants