Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move trivy to own pipeline #290

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024
Merged

move trivy to own pipeline #290

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2024

Conversation

rwaffen
Copy link
Member

@rwaffen rwaffen commented Feb 6, 2024

  • it has to run on main, otherwise it wont work correctly
  • instead run ci.yaml on each push, i move trivy to own pipline
  • other option would be to run ci.yml on main

- it has to run on main, otherwise it wont work correctly
- instead run ci.yaml on each push, i move trivy to own pipline
- other option wpuld be to run ci.yml on main
@rwaffen rwaffen requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2024 09:47
@rwaffen rwaffen added the github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code label Feb 6, 2024
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@rwaffen rwaffen merged commit 8e45159 into main Feb 6, 2024
10 checks passed
@rwaffen rwaffen deleted the move_trivy branch February 6, 2024 09:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
github_actions Pull requests that update GitHub Actions code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants