Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emphasise that review needs to be continuous #102

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Mar 13, 2023

Conversation

foster999
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@foster999 foster999 linked an issue Dec 22, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@foster999
Copy link
Contributor Author

Some of my changes here aren't very clear or concise, so I'm keen to hear any suggestions for improving them!

Copy link
Contributor

@RuSnook RuSnook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grammar: 'are' missing

Looks good. Difficult to make more concise as there is a lot of detail to convey. I'll keep in mind as I work on issues and might come back to this page later.

book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@foster999
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've added a bit more content here and restructured the page to use active headings as per #86. I haven't finished yet - I'd like to cut down the "Why" section and rephrase other parts to emphasise the action in the headings

Copy link
Contributor

@RuSnook RuSnook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry, my previous review suggestion didn't quite make sense.

book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@foster999
Copy link
Contributor Author

Biggest changes were around what are now the first two sections. I'm still not totally happy with them, so keen to have a second opinion please!

@foster999 foster999 requested a review from RuSnook February 21, 2023 12:29
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@RuSnook RuSnook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've updated the 2 grammatically issues I found. I think it looks good. But will request review from Dan for another set of eyes.

@RuSnook RuSnook requested a review from shilohd February 22, 2023 11:15
Copy link
Contributor

@rowanhemsi rowanhemsi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some very picky feedback that you can choose to ignore, but generally I like this update

book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
book/peer_review.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rowanhemsi rowanhemsi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good, thanks for addressing my earlier feedback

Only other thing is a general reminder of the Hemingway app, which can help pick up readability issues like a couple of the wordier sentences I flagged before

book/peer_review.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Direct review to be continuous
3 participants