-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8438 cooperative schema update #65
Conversation
"cooperativeAssociationType": { | ||
"type": "string", | ||
"title": "The association type for cooperative filing" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be an enum. We can do that once values are available.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few changes
@@ -92,4 +94,6 @@ | |||
'TRANSITION', | |||
'TRANSITION_FILING_TEMPLATE', | |||
'UNMANAGED', | |||
'COOP_INCORPORATION', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please keep in alphabetical order
@@ -1612,6 +1693,24 @@ | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
COOP_INCORPORATION_FILING_TEMPLATE = { | |||
'filing': { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use the FILING_HEADER, easier to keep current
'email': '[email protected]', | ||
'phone': '123-456-7890' | ||
}, | ||
'cooperative': { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we can start making the examples fit the same as the schema definition?
a value for _ cooperative_ that is then added to the base incorporation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you suggest to include cooperative in incorporation (example) itself?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in the default incorporation (core) no.
I think we should split these out so that we end up with core, and then IA-, ben, ltd, coop, etc.
@@ -51,8 +49,40 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"nameTranslations": { | |||
"$ref": "https://bcrs.gov.bc.ca/.well_known/schemas/name_translations" | |||
}, | |||
"cooperative": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
change this so it's its own section like nameRequest
and then keep it in alpha order
src/registry_schemas/version.py
Outdated
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ | |||
Development release segment: .devN | |||
""" | |||
|
|||
__version__ = '2.13.1' # pylint: disable=invalid-name | |||
__version__ = '2.13.2' # pylint: disable=invalid-name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i mucked the numbers, will need to be 2.14.0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good.
it should be good to go once the example data is updated
I'm going to merge as I need to add in restoration and I don't want you to have to rebase on that for a simple change. |
Issue #: /bcgov/entity#8438
Description of changes:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of the business-schemas license (Apache 2.0).