Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BattleTech: BTコマンドの結果に成功/失敗を設定する #446

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2021

Conversation

ochaochaocha3
Copy link
Member

Refs #423

BT コマンドの結果に成功/失敗を設定するようにしました。 #445 と合わせると、バトルテックの成功/失敗実装が完了します。

@ochaochaocha3 ochaochaocha3 added the enhance dicebot ダイスボットへの機能追加 label Apr 30, 2021
@ochaochaocha3 ochaochaocha3 requested a review from ysakasin April 30, 2021 09:06
@ochaochaocha3 ochaochaocha3 self-assigned this Apr 30, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #446 (92e666e) into master (20b9e89) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #446   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.21%   95.21%           
=======================================
  Files         288      288           
  Lines       18698    18702    +4     
=======================================
+ Hits        17803    17807    +4     
  Misses        895      895           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
lib/bcdice/game_system/BattleTech.rb 99.40% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 20b9e89...92e666e. Read the comment docs.

@ysakasin ysakasin merged commit 1f6ffd8 into master Apr 30, 2021
@ysakasin
Copy link
Member

ありがとうございます!

@ysakasin ysakasin deleted the battletech-bt-result branch April 30, 2021 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhance dicebot ダイスボットへの機能追加
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants