Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Replace homebrew async result handling (AsyncResponse) with CompletableFuture proper #367

Closed
bbottema opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Replace homebrew async result handling (AsyncResponse) with CompletableFuture proper #367

bbottema opened this issue Jan 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement major feature Priority-Low
Milestone
7.0.0

Comments

@bbottema
Copy link
Owner

bbottema commented Jan 2, 2022

As Simple Java Mail was stuck in Java 7 for a long time, it had to support a homebrew version of CompletableFuture that allowed handlers for success and exceptions. Now that we've finally moved on to Java 8, we can replace everything with CompletableFuture.
@bbottema bbottema added this to the 7.0.0 milestone Jan 2, 2022
@bbottema
Copy link
Owner Author

bbottema commented Jan 2, 2022

Also relates to #148 and #338.

bbottema added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 2, 2022
@bbottema
#367: replaced homebrew async result handling with CompletableFuture
214b14b
@bbottema bbottema changed the title Replace homebrew asyn result handling (AsyncResponse) with CompletableFuture proper Replace homebrew async result handling (AsyncResponse) with CompletableFuture proper Jan 2, 2022
@bbottema bbottema closed this as completed Jan 2, 2022
@bbottema
Copy link
Owner Author

bbottema commented Jan 2, 2022

7.0.0 just released with this improvement.

@bbottema bbottema mentioned this issue Jan 2, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement major feature Priority-Low
Projects
None yet
Milestone
7.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bbottema