Reasonable scala

[softprops]

Recognizing scalac is slow no matter how you engineer around it and the fact that zinc integration may complicate the bazel model here is another option to keep an eye on https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala

[ittaiz]

Thanks! Do you have an AI we can make out of it or is it more of an FYI?

…

On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 at 16:22 doug tangren ***@***.***> wrote: Recognizing scalac is slow no matter how you engineer around it and the fact that zinc integration may complicate the bazel model here is another option to keep an eye on https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#263>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUIFx6Z84q-xHKzi4IWDeUcTeV9wRg_ks5sZZADgaJpZM4O7i-z> .

[softprops]

lol. More or less this is just and FYI. Just crossed my radar and wanted to leave a bread crumb for future reference. I don't have any insider info myself ( just high hopes! )

[ittaiz]

Got you. Crossed my radar today as well :)
I'll close this if you don't mind since we have a lot of open issues and I'd rather we keep the ones we can actually advance.
Please feel free to reopen if you think otherwise or want to resurface

[ittaiz]

I actually think I was too quick to close this.
Maybe an AI can be to have an experimental rsc worker?
@softprops WDYT? In addition do you think it would interest you to try and contribute such a worker?
cc @gkossakowski who might be interested in this as well

[softprops]

There wasn't any actual code under https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala available yet. Is it
hosted/published somewhere else?

[ittaiz]

Good question. Not sure. In any case even if it's not published yet I guess it will be soon since it sounds like they have an initial something working. Do you think the AI I outlined is relevant?

…

On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 at 21:33 doug tangren ***@***.***> wrote: There wasn't any actual code under https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala available yet. It's is hosted/published somewhere else? — You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#263 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUIFwZsGmG_t5C8JPl8l7rdbg1pAMJsks5saHv1gaJpZM4O7i-z> .

[gkossakowski]

Hi, new to the convo. What's the AI you're referring to? Thanks for CC'ing me. rsc builds on ideas I explored in Kentucky Mule. I'm curious how Twitter's effort is going to unfold. On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:09 PM Ittai Zeidman <[email protected]> wrote:

Good question. Not sure. In any case even if it's not published yet I guess it will be soon since it sounds like they have an initial something working. Do you think the AI I outlined is relevant? On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 at 21:33 doug tangren ***@***.***> wrote: > There wasn't any actual code under > https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala available yet. It's is > hosted/published somewhere else? > > — > You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. > > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > < #263 (comment) >, > or mute the thread > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUIFwZsGmG_t5C8JPl8l7rdbg1pAMJsks5saHv1gaJpZM4O7i-z > > . > — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#263 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAQeW2wnXFdUNGs6-ZGjCdciSylzRIyks5saIROgaJpZM4O7i-z> .

-- gkk

[softprops]

Also curious. Please don't say action item ;)

[ittaiz]

The "change" I suggested (and which might not be the right one) is to add a new worker which will use rsc compiler instead of the scalac compiler and have that as an experimental worker. So people can experiment with it and give back feedback. I know, this is as good as place as any to say thank you for those ideas and explorations. I have to say it brought some hope when I read it :)

…

On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 at 0:57 doug tangren ***@***.***> wrote: Also curious. Please don't say action item ;) — You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#263 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABUIF0bf8g5fITONmpFCB7HHl8HxRNIuks5saKu_gaJpZM4O7i-z> .

[ittaiz]

@gkossakowski you've probably saw this tweet:

The prototype of the Reasonable Scala typechecker has been released open source and is more than 20x faster than Scala.

https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala
Any chance you'll try to take it out for a spin in rules_scala?

[gkossakowski]

Yeah I saw it. I've been following some of the news because it's directly inspired by my work on Kentucky Mule I think trying it out from command line is fine as long as it's in it's current infant phase.

…

On 16 November 2017 at 12:35, Ittai Zeidman ***@***.***> wrote: @gkossakowski <https://github.com/gkossakowski> you've probably saw this tweet <https://twitter.com/TwitterOSS/status/931257305542172672>: The prototype of the Reasonable Scala typechecker has been released open source and is more than 20x faster than Scala. https://github.com/twitter/reasonable-scala Any chance you'll try to take it out for a spin in rules_scala? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#263 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAQeQ_twpGYrcLr6emCBRGPyRX7raf1ks5s3JyRgaJpZM4O7i-z> .

-- gkk