-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tool executables (from FilesToRunProvider) to action inputs. #10110
Closed
jmillikin
wants to merge
5
commits into
bazelbuild:master
from
jmillikin:add-tool-executables-to-action-inputs
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ca0e703
Add tool executables (from FilesToRunProvider) to action inputs.
jmillikin 854a9df
Use a batch file on Windows in the test.
jmillikin 91d16c6
Add executable to filesToRun in FilesToRunProvider constructor.
jmillikin 0ab74a5
Move injection of executable into RuleConfiguredTargetBuilder
jmillikin 46fd2ce
Check ruleContext.getRule().getRuleClassObject().isSkylark()
jmillikin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will create an extra
NestedSet
instance for every call site, most importantly, in the constructor ofFileConfiguredTarget
, which means an extra object for each input file, which is probably unacceptable overhead.How about special-casing at least
#fromSingleExecutableArtifact()
so that this overhead is not present?Given that the only other call site is in
RuleConfiguredTargetBuilder#build()
, I'd prefer putting logic there because, well, that place already has logic. In addition to being a personal preference, you also have more information, notably,ruleContext.getRule().getRuleClassObject().isSkylark()
, which you can use to determine whether this is a Starlark rule and thus adding the binary to the nested set is necessary.Even better is changing
SkylarkRuleConfiguredTargetUtil#addSimpleProviders()
-- that place has control over both theexecutable and
filesToBuildfields of
RuleConfiguredTargetBuilderand is specific to Starlark rules, so you can just add the "executable is forcibly added to
filesToRun`" logic there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.