Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add [email protected] #3306

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add [email protected] #3306

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

tongke6
Copy link
Contributor

@tongke6 tongke6 commented Dec 3, 2024

No description provided.

@bazel-io
Copy link
Member

bazel-io commented Dec 3, 2024

Hello @protobuf-team-bot, @zhangskz, @mkruskal-google, @googleberg, modules you maintain (protobuf) have been updated in this PR. Please review the changes.

@tongke6 tongke6 marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2024 11:48
@tongke6 tongke6 force-pushed the tk/protobuf branch 2 times, most recently from 4362718 to d221d3a Compare December 3, 2024 12:08
@tongke6 tongke6 marked this pull request as ready for review December 3, 2024 14:22
@tongke6 tongke6 mentioned this pull request Dec 4, 2024
1 task
module(
name = "protobuf",
version = "25.5",
compatibility_level = 1,
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it is better to have repo_name = "com_google_protobuf", because of https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/9d0ec0f92b5b5fdeeda11f9dcecc1872ff378014/WORKSPACE#L1, and there are references to this name in the repo.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was written in imitation of the bzlmod files from other versions of protobuf in the BCR, none of them include the repo_name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants