You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Often, high-ranking DTU hits are just gene switch on/off events, where the very few transcripts seen in one of the two conditions can create an artificially massive change in isoform proportions.
Set better noise criteria, or find a way to flag and discount gene on/off events and marginal above-noise cases.
It is not RATs' intention to identify significant DGE in general, but when one of the conditions is very lowly expressed, it leads to results I do not find particularly convincing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
- 51: fixed the bug where accidentally the same isoform must exceed
noise in both conditions.
- 48: The noise threshold is applied to the total gene abundance as
well, preventing genes that are switched off in one condition from
creating wild proportions and exaggerated effect sizes.
Often, high-ranking DTU hits are just gene switch on/off events, where the very few transcripts seen in one of the two conditions can create an artificially massive change in isoform proportions.
Set better noise criteria, or find a way to flag and discount gene on/off events and marginal above-noise cases.
It is not RATs' intention to identify significant DGE in general, but when one of the conditions is very lowly expressed, it leads to results I do not find particularly convincing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: