Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove outdated code coverage tracking for Cotton Candy #2303

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

bartfeenstra
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra added enhancement New feature or request python Pull requests that update Python code labels Feb 8, 2025
@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra added this to the 0.4.x milestone Feb 8, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.88%. Comparing base (9a99a51) to head (5803b70).
Report is 1 commits behind head on 0.4.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            0.4.x    #2303   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.88%   97.88%           
=======================================
  Files         369      369           
  Lines       23400    23400           
  Branches     1089     1089           
=======================================
  Hits        22906    22906           
  Misses        339      339           
  Partials      155      155           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2025 23:17
@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra merged commit a77e116 into 0.4.x Feb 8, 2025
8 checks passed
@bartfeenstra bartfeenstra deleted the fix-cotton-candy-coverage branch February 8, 2025 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant