Upgrade Node.js from v18.19 to LTS v20.18 #586 #587
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to several GitHub Actions workflow files to change the Node.js version from various earlier versions to Changes
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.prettierrc.js (1)
8-8: Consider updating tobracketSameLinefor future compatibility.The
jsxBracketSameLine: falsesetting is correct and places the closing bracket of a multi-line JSX element on a new line, which can improve readability. However, this option has been deprecated in newer Prettier versions.For future compatibility, consider updating to the newer option name:
- jsxBracketSameLine: false, + bracketSameLine: false,.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1)
Line range hint
38-39: Consider implementing a version update strategy for capture-website-cli.While using a specific version (4.0.0) of capture-website-cli ensures consistency, it may miss out on newer features or bug fixes. Consider implementing a strategy to periodically review and update this dependency.
You could:
- Set up a dependabot configuration to automatically update this package.
- Add a TODO comment to remind the team to check for updates periodically.
- Use a version range (e.g., ^4.0.0) to automatically get non-breaking updates.
Example of adding a TODO comment:
- name: Install global dependencies run: | + # TODO: Periodically check for updates to capture-website-cli npm install --global [email protected].github/workflows/lint.yml (2)
Line range hint
151-201: New branch name linting job is a valuable addition.The
lint-branch-namejob effectively enforces branch naming conventions, which is crucial for maintaining a clean and organized Git history. The implementation looks solid and aligns with common Git workflow practices.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a
release/**pattern to the branch naming convention. This can be useful for branches dedicated to release preparation. Here's the suggested change:- branch_pattern: "feat|fix|build|ci|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|chore" + branch_pattern: "feat|fix|build|ci|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|chore|release"Also, update the comment to include this new pattern:
+ `release/**` | Preparing for a new releaseThis addition would make the branch naming convention more comprehensive and accommodate release-specific workflows.
Line range hint
44-63: Improved JSON linting process.The changes to the
lint-jsonjob enhance the JSON validation process by usingjsonlint-phpand providing more detailed feedback. This is a valuable improvement to the overall linting workflow.A minor suggestion for improvement:
Consider adding a step to install
jsonlint-phpexplicitly in the job, rather than relying on it being pre-installed. This would make the job more self-contained and portable. Here's a suggested addition:- name: Install jsonlint-php run: | sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install -y jsonlintAdd this step before the "Lint json files" step to ensure
jsonlint-phpis always available.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lint.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/update-versioned-docs.yml (1 hunks)
- .prettierrc.js (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (19)
.prettierrc.js (11)
2-2: LGTM: Appropriate print width setting.The
printWidthof 100 is a good balance between readability and efficient use of screen space. It's a common choice in modern development practices.
3-3: LGTM: Standard tab width setting.The
tabWidthof 2 spaces is a widely adopted standard in JavaScript and TypeScript projects. It provides a good balance between code compactness and readability.
5-5: LGTM: Consistent quote style.The
singleQuote: truesetting enforces the use of single quotes for string literals, which is a common preference in JavaScript projects. This promotes consistency across the codebase.
7-7: LGTM: Improved object literal readability.The
bracketSpacing: truesetting adds spaces between brackets in object literals, which enhances readability. This is a widely adopted practice in JavaScript development.
10-10: LGTM: Appropriate prose wrapping setting.The
proseWrap: 'preserve'setting maintains the original wrapping of prose content. This is beneficial for preserving intended formatting in comments and other prose sections within the code.
11-11: LGTM: Consistent JSX attribute quoting.The
jsxSingleQuote: falsesetting uses double quotes for JSX attributes. This aligns with HTML conventions and improves readability when JSX attributes contain string literals with single quotes.
12-12: LGTM: Consistent indentation using spaces.The
useTabs: falsesetting ensures that spaces are used for indentation instead of tabs. This is consistent with thetabWidthsetting and promotes uniform rendering across different editors and platforms.
13-13: LGTM: Appropriate HTML whitespace handling.The
htmlWhitespaceSensitivity: 'css'setting respects the default white space sensitivity as defined by CSS display properties. This provides a good balance between consistent formatting and respecting intentional white space in HTML-like syntaxes.
15-15: LGTM: Appropriate object property quoting.The
quoteProps: 'as-needed'setting only adds quotes around object properties when necessary. This provides a good balance between readability and conciseness in object literals.
Line range hint
16-23: LGTM: Appropriate SCSS-specific override.The
overridessection for SCSS files, which setssingleQuote: false, is maintained. This ensures consistency with SCSS conventions, which typically use double quotes. Keeping this unchanged maintains consistency with existing SCSS files in the project.
4-4: Consider team alignment on semicolon usage.The
semi: falsesetting omits semicolons at the end of statements. While this is a valid stylistic choice, it's crucial to ensure all team members are familiar with JavaScript's Automatic Semicolon Insertion (ASI) rules to prevent potential issues.To ensure consistent usage across the project, run the following script:
If the script returns results, consider discussing whether to enforce the no-semicolon rule more strictly or to revert to using semicolons.
✅ Verification successful
Refine semicolon usage check to target source code only.
To avoid false positives from third-party scripts and configuration files, please run the following script to check for explicit semicolon usage solely within the project's source code:
Semicolon usage conforms to the configuration.
The
semi: falsesetting is properly enforced across the project. Only intentional semicolons are present, ensuring consistency with the project's style guidelines.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any explicit semicolon usage in JavaScript/TypeScript files # Test: Search for lines ending with semicolons in JS/TS files rg --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' --type js '[^)];$' -g '!*.{json,lock}'Length of output: 843
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for explicit semicolon usage in project source files excluding specific directories and file types rg --type-add 'js:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' --type js '[^)];$' \ -g '!*.{json,lock}' \ -g '!static/**' \ -g '!babel.config.js'Length of output: 553
.github/workflows/build.yml (2)
Line range hint
1-35: Verify dependency compatibility and yarn.lock updates.While the workflow update looks good, please ensure that:
- All project dependencies are compatible with Node.js 20.18.
- The
yarn.lockfile has been regenerated to reflect any necessary dependency updates.These steps will help maintain project stability with the new Node.js version.
To verify the
yarn.lockupdate:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if yarn.lock has been updated in this PR # Test: Check for changes in yarn.lock git diff --name-only origin/main... | grep -q 'yarn.lock' && echo "yarn.lock has been updated" || echo "yarn.lock has not been updated"
26-26: Node.js version successfully updated to 20.18.The Node.js version has been correctly updated from 18.19 to 20.18, which aligns with the PR objectives to upgrade to the latest LTS version. This change should ensure that the build process uses the desired Node.js version.
To ensure consistency across the project, let's verify if other workflow files have been updated similarly:
✅ Verification successful
Node.js version successfully updated in
.github/workflows/build.ymlonly.The Node.js version has been correctly updated to 20.18 in
.github/workflows/build.yml. No other workflow files were found with different Node.js version specifications. This ensures that the build process utilizes the desired Node.js version consistently.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if other workflow files use the same Node.js version # Test: Search for Node.js version specifications in other workflow files rg --type yaml 'node-version:' .github/workflows/*.ymlLength of output: 120
.github/workflows/capture-website.yml (1)
34-34: LGTM! Verify compatibility with capture-website-cli.The Node.js version upgrade to 20.18 is consistent with the PR objectives. This change should improve the workflow's performance and security.
To ensure compatibility, please verify that
[email protected]works correctly with Node.js 20.18. Run the following script to check thecapture-website-clipackage'senginesfield:If the output shows compatibility with Node.js 20.x, no further action is needed. Otherwise, consider updating
capture-website-clito a version that supports Node.js 20.18.✅ Verification successful
Compatibility Verified
The
[email protected]supports Node.js versions>=18, including20.18. The upgrade to Node.js v20.18 is compatible and should not cause issues with thecapture-website-cli.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check capture-website-cli compatibility with Node.js 20.18 # Test: Retrieve the engines field from capture-website-cli package.json npm view [email protected] engines --jsonLength of output: 122
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check capture-website-cli compatibility with Node.js 20.18 using curl and jq # Fetch the package information from the npm registry curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/capture-website-cli/4.0.0 | jq '.engines'Length of output: 97
package.json (1)
14-14: Approved: Node.js version upgrade to v20.18 LTSThe update to Node.js v20.18 LTS is a positive change that aligns with the PR objectives. This upgrade ensures long-term support and security updates for the project.
To ensure project compatibility with the new Node.js version, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Node.js version upgrade to v20.18 LTS
The verification scripts did not identify any compatibility issues with the new Node.js v20.18. The project should be compatible with this upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify project compatibility with Node.js v20.18 # Test: Check if any scripts in package.json use Node.js version-specific features echo "Checking package.json scripts for potential compatibility issues:" jq -r '.scripts | to_entries[] | .key + ": " + .value' package.json # Test: Scan for potential compatibility issues in JavaScript files echo "Scanning JavaScript files for potential compatibility issues:" rg -t js -n 'Buffer\.|\butil\.|\bfs\.' --glob '!node_modules' # Note: This script provides a starting point for verification. Manual testing and review of the results are recommended.Length of output: 873
.github/workflows/update-versioned-docs.yml (1)
67-67: Approved: Node.js version update to 20.18The update to Node.js 20.18 aligns with the PR objective to upgrade to the latest LTS version. This change should improve performance and provide access to newer features.
To ensure consistency across the project, please run the following script to check the Node.js version specified in other workflow files and the
package.json:This will help ensure that the Node.js version is consistently updated across all relevant files in the project.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Node.js version is consistent across workflows and package.json
The Node.js version has been consistently updated to 20.18 across all workflow files and is correctly specified in
package.json. This ensures uniformity and aligns with the project's requirements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Node.js version consistency across workflow files and package.json # Check workflow files echo "Checking workflow files:" rg --type yaml 'node-version:' .github/workflows/ # Check package.json echo "\nChecking package.json:" jq '.engines.node' package.jsonLength of output: 522
.github/workflows/lint.yml (3)
203-203: Node.js version update for SCSS linting is consistent.The update to Node.js v20.18 for SCSS linting is consistent with the change in the
lint-webjob and aligns with the PR objective.
Line range hint
1-215: Overall, the changes to the lint workflow are well-implemented and valuable.The updates to Node.js versions, the addition of branch name linting, and the improvements to JSON linting all contribute to a more robust and comprehensive linting process. These changes align well with the PR objectives and modern development practices.
To ensure everything works as expected after these changes:
- Run the entire lint workflow locally or in a test environment.
- Verify that all linting jobs, especially the new and modified ones, complete successfully.
- Test with various scenarios (e.g., valid and invalid branch names, different JSON files) to ensure the new linting rules are enforced correctly.
108-108: Node.js version update looks good.The update to Node.js v20.18 aligns with the PR objective and ensures the linting process uses the latest LTS version.
To ensure compatibility, please run the following script to check for any deprecation warnings or new features that might affect the linting process:
|
Should we apply the suggestions from coderabbitai from above to .prettierrc.js file or we should keep the defaults? (I am not sure whether to Resolve the threads or Apply the changes) |
|
@coderabbitai pause |
✅ Actions performedReviews paused. |
ccamel
force-pushed
the
develop/package-upgrade
branch
from
6588a14 to
e60020d
Compare
It’s fine as it is. I’ve just rebased your branch to resolve conflicts—hope you don’t mind! |
Thank you, I'm glad it works! 🚀 |
Updated:
After the above, i made sure that the build and local environment is running.
This PR is connected to the #586
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Configuration Changes