feat: update ticker AXONE #476
Conversation
WalkthroughThe overarching change across the documentation involves the renaming of the Axone blockchain's native token from Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 27
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (12)
- docs/academy/part-2/describe-resource.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/academy/part-2/describe-zone.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/academy/part-2/resource-governance.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/academy/part-2/zone-governance.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/faq/faq.md (1 hunks)
- docs/tutorials/cli-1.mdx (2 hunks)
- docs/tutorials/explorer-sc.md (2 hunks)
- docs/tutorials/keplr-1.mdx (6 hunks)
- docs/whitepaper/architecture.mdx (5 hunks)
- docs/whitepaper/roles.md (3 hunks)
- docs/whitepaper/token-model.mdx (1 hunks)
- docs/whitepaper/use-cases.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (24)
docs/whitepaper/token-model.mdx (1)
31-31: The introduction of a tax on value-creating network activities, such as workflows, is a significant change. It's crucial to ensure that the implementation details of this tax are clearly documented and communicated to the network participants. This includes the tax rate, collection mechanism, and how it impacts the $AXONE token supply and inflation rate.docs/tutorials/explorer-sc.md (1)
34-34: The update from "$AXON" to "$AXONE" tokens is noted. It's important to ensure that all external links and references within the tutorial are also updated to reflect this change, maintaining consistency and avoiding confusion for users.docs/tutorials/keplr-1.mdx (1)
37-37: The change from "$AXON" to "$AXONE" tokens is correctly applied. It's essential to verify that all instances of the token name within the tutorial have been updated to ensure consistency and clarity for users.Verification successful
The search for any missed "$AXON" references in the
docs/tutorials/keplr-1.mdxfile did not yield any results, indicating that all instances have been correctly updated to "$AXONE". This confirms the consistency and clarity of the tutorial regarding the token name change.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any missed "$AXON" references in the tutorial. rg --type md '$AXON' docs/tutorials/keplr-1.mdxLength of output: 49
docs/whitepaper/roles.md (2)
39-39: The update from$AXONto$AXONEtokens for Delegators is correctly applied. It's crucial to ensure that the implications of this change on Delegators' responsibilities and interactions with the protocol are clearly communicated to the community.
61-61: The change from$AXONto$AXONEtokens for DAO Participants is noted. Ensure that the documentation clearly outlines how this change affects DAO Participants' ability to propose and vote on protocol improvements.docs/academy/part-2/describe-zone.mdx (3)
188-188: The token name update from$AXONto$AXONEis correctly applied here, ensuring consistency with the new naming convention across the documentation.
185-191: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [36-36]
The warning about the
--keyring-backend testoption is crucial for security. It's well-placed and clearly warns against its use in production environments.
188-188: Ensure the context of fee payments in$AXONEis clear to the reader, especially regarding how fees are calculated and any potential minimum fee requirements.docs/academy/part-2/describe-resource.mdx (3)
259-259: The token name update from$AXONto$AXONEis correctly applied here, ensuring consistency with the new naming convention across the documentation.
256-262: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [39-39]
The warning about the
--keyring-backend testoption is crucial for security. It's well-placed and clearly warns against its use in production environments.
259-259: Ensure the context of fee payments in$AXONEis clear to the reader, especially regarding how fees are calculated and any potential minimum fee requirements.docs/academy/part-2/zone-governance.mdx (7)
291-291: The document mentions the need to pay fees in$AXONEfor transactions on the Axone blockchain. This aligns with the PR's objective to update the token name across the documentation. Ensure that all instances of the token name throughout the document and the project's documentation reflect this change for consistency.
288-294: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [13-13]
Consider capitalizing "Zone" and "Dataverse" consistently throughout the document. In some instances, "Zone" is capitalized, suggesting it's being used as a proper noun, which might be the intended usage given the context of a specific feature within the Axone blockchain. Clarify and ensure consistent capitalization according to the intended meaning.
288-294: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [15-15]
The term "Governance VP" is mentioned, which might be a typo or a specific term within the context of the Axone blockchain. If it stands for "Governance Verifiable Presentation" or a similar concept, consider expanding the acronym on its first use to clarify for readers unfamiliar with the term.
288-294: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [66-66]
The term "Prolog" is correctly spelled, but the static analysis tool flagged it as a possible mistake. This is a false positive, as Prolog is a programming language used in the context of codifying governance rules. No action is needed here.
291-291: The document correctly uses "$AXONE" as the token name, aligning with the PR's objective. Ensure that this naming convention is consistently applied across all documentation and code references within the project.
288-294: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [123-123]
The document lists elements with dashes ("-") at the beginning of bullet points. This formatting is correct for Markdown and does not constitute a loose punctuation mark. No action is needed here.
288-294: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [53-59]
The document contains tables with repeated whitespaces for alignment purposes. While this is common in Markdown to enhance readability in raw format, ensure that it renders correctly on the intended platform. If the platform supports it, consider using Markdown table formatting for better consistency.
docs/whitepaper/use-cases.md (3)
101-104: The token name update from$AXONto$AXONEis correctly applied in the context of payment conditions. This change ensures consistency with the new token naming convention across the documentation.
104-106: The update to the token name from$AXONto$AXONEin the context of service execution payments is correctly implemented. This change aligns with the project's objective to maintain consistency in the token's representation.
98-109: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [312-312]
The mention of fee payments in
$AXONEtokens when interacting with the Axone blockchain is accurate and aligns with the token name update across the documentation. This ensures clarity for users regarding the required currency for transactions.docs/academy/part-2/resource-governance.mdx (1)
312-312: The update to the token name from$AXONto$AXONEfor fee payments when interacting with the Axone blockchain is correctly applied. This change ensures consistency with the project's updated token naming convention.docs/whitepaper/architecture.mdx (2)
32-38: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [9-9]
The term "safekeeps" might be considered informal or less common. Consider using "safeguards" for clarity and formality.
33-33: The document mentions the Axone blockchain native coin as $KNOW, which seems inconsistent with the PR's objective to update the ticker name to $AXONE. Please verify this reference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| desktop | http://localhost:3000/ |
| Device | URL |
|---|---|
| mobile | http://localhost:3000/ |
Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/tutorials/cli-1.mdx (3 hunks)
- docs/whitepaper/token-model.mdx (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
docs/whitepaper/token-model.mdx (1)
19-25: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [22-31]
The explanation of the AXONE Token Model and the introduction of a tax on workflows is clear and aligns well with the PR's objectives. However, consider clarifying the comparison with Ethereum's EIP-1559 for readers unfamiliar with Ethereum's mechanisms.
- Unlike Ethereum's [EIP-1559](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1559), which reduces inflation through fee burning, Axone introduces a tax on value-creating network activity: the workflows. + Unlike Ethereum's [EIP-1559](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1559) which aims to reduce inflation by burning a part of transaction fees, Axone introduces a unique approach by imposing a tax on value-creating network activities, known as workflows. This method not only aims to secure the network but also potentially reduces the long-term supply of $AXONE tokens.docs/tutorials/cli-1.mdx (5)
138-138: The faucet instruction correctly uses$AXONE. However, the previous comment about adjusting the currency symbol placement is still valid. Ensure the currency symbol precedes the amount without any space for consistency with common financial notation.
151-151: The section title has been correctly updated to$AXONE, reflecting the new token name. This change aligns with the PR objectives and ensures consistency throughout the document.
117-123: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [165-165]
The abbreviation "AXONn" seems to be a typo. Correct it to maintain the professionalism of the documentation.
117-123: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [189-189]
The link to
jqdocumentation is incorrect. Update it to the correct URL to ensure users can find the right resource.
117-123: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [407-407]
There's an unpaired symbol in the section title "Recap'". Remove the unnecessary apostrophe for correct formatting.
|
@CodeRabbit pause |
Update ticker name with AXONE.
Summary by CodeRabbit
$AXONto$AXONEacross various documentation pages to ensure consistency.