-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat/add okp4d modules doc #443
Conversation
WalkthroughThe documentation updates span across three main modules: Logic, Mint, and Vesting, over versions 4.0.0 to 7.0.0. These updates introduce and refine features for a Prolog logic interpreter, inflation rewards calculation, and various types of vesting accounts. Enhancements include performance considerations, blockchain-specific predicates, and detailed protobuf message definitions. The evolution reflects a focus on determinism, security, and expanding functionality within the blockchain ecosystem. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
1b200ad
to
a443aa6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 39
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
modules_versioned_sidebars/version-v4.0.0-sidebars.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
modules_versioned_sidebars/version-v4.1.0-sidebars.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
modules_versioned_sidebars/version-v5.0.0-sidebars.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
modules_versioned_sidebars/version-v6.0.0-sidebars.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
modules_versioned_sidebars/version-v7.0.0-sidebars.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
modules_versions.json
is excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (15)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/logic.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/mint.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/vesting.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.1.0/logic.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.1.0/mint.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.1.0/vesting.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v5.0.0/logic.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v5.0.0/mint.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v5.0.0/vesting.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/mint.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/vesting.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/logic.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/mint.md (1 hunks)
- modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/vesting.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 67
modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/mint.md (1)
- 1-1: The disclaimer is clear and appropriately informs the reader that the document is auto-generated and should not be manually modified.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/mint.md (5)
- 1-1: The file starts with a comment indicating it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is important for maintainability and ensuring that changes are made through the correct automated processes.
- 3-11: The introduction and description of the Minting Module's function are clear and concise, effectively setting the context for the module's role within the blockchain ecosystem.
- 23-48: The Table of Contents is well-organized, providing easy navigation to different sections of the protobuf documentation. This enhances the document's usability.
- 53-235: The protobuf documentation sections are detailed and provide a comprehensive overview of the mint module's components, including types, requests, and responses. The structure is consistent and follows best practices for API documentation. Ensure all links are functional and lead to the correct anchors within the document for optimal navigation.
- 235-253: The Scalar Value Types section is a useful reference for understanding the data types used in the protobuf definitions. It's well-structured and provides clear mappings between protobuf types and language-specific types.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/mint.md (4)
- 1-1: The disclaimer at the beginning of the file mentions that it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is a good practice to ensure that automated processes are not inadvertently disrupted by manual edits.
- 9-11: The description of the Minting Module's function is clear and concise, effectively summarizing its role in the blockchain ecosystem.
- 23-48: The Table of Contents is well-organized, providing easy navigation to different sections of the document. However, ensure that spaces between sentences are consistent throughout the document, as suggested by the static analysis tool.
- 53-255: The protobuf documentation sections are detailed and informative, providing a comprehensive overview of the mint module's protobuf messages and services. Ensure that all protobuf type names and field descriptions are accurate and up-to-date with the actual protobuf definitions.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v5.0.0/mint.md (7)
- 1-1: The disclaimer at the beginning of the file is a good practice to indicate that the file is auto-generated and should not be manually modified. This helps maintain the integrity of the documentation.
- 14-25: The explanation of the calculation process for inflation rewards is clear and informative. It provides a good understanding of how the initial inflation, annual provisions, and target supply are set and adjusted. This section is well-written and does not require changes.
- 56-74: The documentation under
mint/v1beta1/mint.proto
for theMinter
type is clear and provides a good explanation of the minting state at the beginning of the chain. It correctly outlines how theannual_provisions
andtarget_supply
are calculated based on the genesis total token supply and configured inflation. No changes are needed here.- 77-90: The
Params
section undermint/v1beta1/mint.proto
effectively explains how the annual reduction factor influences the token distribution rate by adjusting the inflation annually. The example provided enhances understanding. This section is well-written and informative.- 100-114: The
GenesisState
documentation undermint/v1beta1/genesis.proto
is concise and clear, explaining the role of theminter
andparams
fields in defining the mint module's genesis state. This section is accurate and does not require modifications.- 124-178: The query and message types under
mint/v1beta1/query.proto
andmint/v1beta1/tx.proto
are well-documented, with clear descriptions for each type and their fields. The structure and content here provide a comprehensive overview of the available RPC methods and message types for interacting with the mint module. This section is thorough and well-constructed.- 249-267: The Scalar Value Types section provides a useful reference for the different protobuf scalar value types and their mappings to various programming languages. This is a valuable resource for developers working with the mint module's protobuf definitions. No changes are needed here.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/vesting.md (1)
- 1-1: The comment at the beginning of the file indicates it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is important for maintainability and ensuring that changes are made through the appropriate generation process rather than direct edits.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.1.0/vesting.md (5)
- 1-6: The header and initial comments are well-structured and provide clear instructions not to manually modify the auto-generated file. The inclusion of a title and a navigational link to the top of the document follows good documentation practices.
- 7-30: The table of contents is comprehensive, covering all the Protobuf messages related to vesting accounts and transaction messages. The use of anchor links for easy navigation is commendable.
- 37-126: The account type descriptions, including the overview and field tables, are clear and informative. They provide a comprehensive understanding of each vesting account type's structure and purpose.
- 138-253: The transaction message descriptions, including their purposes and detailed field tables, are concise and informative. They effectively convey the functionality of each message related to vesting accounts.
- 255-273: The scalar value types section is well-organized and provides a useful reference for mapping Protobuf types to various programming languages, adhering to standard Protobuf documentation practices.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v5.0.0/vesting.md (3)
- 1-1: The note at the beginning of the document clearly states that it is auto-generated. This is a good practice as it informs contributors not to manually edit the file, ensuring that automated processes maintain the document's integrity.
- 37-242: The documentation for each vesting account type and transaction message is clear and comprehensive. It effectively describes the functionality and structure of each account type and message, providing valuable information for developers and users.
- 255-273: The Scalar Value Types section is well-organized and informative, providing a valuable reference for developers working with Protobuf definitions across different programming languages.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/vesting.md (3)
- 3-3: The term "Protobuf Documentation" might be flagged as a possible spelling mistake. However, in this context, "Protobuf" is correct as it refers to Protocol Buffers, a method of serializing structured data. No change is needed here.
- 10-10: The hint suggests adding a space between sentences. However, this is a markdown list item, not a sentence structure. The formatting is correct as per markdown syntax for creating a list of links.
- 257-257: The hint suggests not putting a space before the full stop. However, this line is part of a table header in markdown, not a sentence. The formatting is correct for the intended purpose.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/vesting.md (4)
- 1-1: The file starts with a comment indicating it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is a good practice for auto-generated documentation, ensuring that manual changes are not overwritten by subsequent generations.
- 3-3: The document title "Protobuf Documentation" is clear and appropriate for the content that follows, which details Protobuf message types and fields for the vesting module.
- 7-30: The Table of Contents is well-structured, providing a quick overview of the document's contents and facilitating easy navigation to specific sections.
- 255-273: The "Scalar Value Types" section provides a useful reference for the types used in the Protobuf definitions. This section is well-organized and clear.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v4.0.0/logic.md (7)
- 3-3: The document starts with a comment indicating it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is a standard practice for auto-generated documentation, ensuring that manual changes are not overwritten by subsequent generations. However, the spelling suggestion for "Protobuf" as "Proof, Protocol, Proto, Proton, Pronoun" is incorrect and should be ignored, as "Protobuf" is the correct term referring to Google's Protocol Buffers.
- 9-11: The description of the logic module implementing a Prolog logic interpreter is accurate and provides a good overview of its functionality. The links to Prolog and unification algorithm on Wikipedia are helpful for readers unfamiliar with these concepts. However, the spelling suggestion to replace "Prolog" with "PROLOG, Prolong, Proof, Polo, Promo" is incorrect, as "Prolog" is the correct term for the programming language.
- 52-52: The hint suggesting "nobody" instead of "no body" in the context of a fact having no conditions is a misunderstanding. In Prolog and similar logic programming languages, a "fact" is indeed a rule without a body, so the original text is correct.
- 85-85: The suggestion not to put a space after the opening parenthesis in the
Ask
message format example is incorrect. The formatting used in the document is correct and follows JSON object notation standards, where spaces are not typically placed directly after opening braces or before closing braces.- 98-98: The hint about a possible typo due to repeated whitespace is incorrect. The formatting in the example JSON snippet is standard and improves readability. No change is necessary.
- 186-186: The suggestion to rephrase "does not have the ability to submit transactions or make changes to the blockchain's state" for stronger wording is valid. However, the original phrasing is clear and accurately describes the module's limitations. It's a matter of stylistic preference, and the current wording is acceptable.
- 442-442: The hint about not putting a space before the full stop and the suggestion that only proper nouns start with an uppercase character in the "Scalar Value Types" section are based on a misunderstanding of the context. The formatting and capitalization in this section are appropriate for the content being presented, which includes table headers and technical terms.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v7.0.0/logic.md (8)
- 1-1: The file header indicates that it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is a good practice to prevent accidental edits to generated documentation.
- 9-11: The description of the logic module implementing a Prolog logic interpreter and its unification algorithm is clear and informative, providing a solid understanding of the module's purpose.
- 19-37: The "Concepts" section introduces key concepts like Program, Predicate, Rule & Fact, and Variable in a structured manner, making it easy for readers to grasp the foundational elements of the logic module.
- 77-97: The "Query" section, including the description of the
Ask
message format, is well-explained. It effectively communicates how queries are structured and evaluated within the module.- 160-168: The "Performance" section provides valuable insights into optimizing query performance and the use of backtracking. This information is crucial for developers looking to efficiently use the logic module.
- 170-176: The explanation of gas consumption for the
Ask
message and its role in limiting query size and complexity is informative, helping users understand the cost implications of their queries.- 178-190: The "Security" section effectively outlines the deterministic nature of the logic module and its sandboxed execution environment, along with the limitations in place to control resource usage.
- 192-223: The "Table of Contents" section provides a helpful overview of the protobuf documentation structure, making it easier for developers to navigate to specific parts of the documentation.
modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md (19)
- 1-1: The file header mentions that it is auto-generated and should not be modified manually. This is a good practice to prevent accidental edits to auto-generated documentation.
- 9-11: The introduction to the logic module and its capabilities is clear and concise, providing a good overview of its purpose and functionality.
- 19-25: The section on "Program" accurately describes what a program is in the context of the logic module. It's clear and provides a good foundation for understanding subsequent concepts.
- 26-29: The explanation of "Predicate" is accurate and easy to understand, effectively introducing the concept to readers unfamiliar with logic programming.
- 31-35: The distinction between "Rule" and "Fact" is well explained, providing clear examples that help in understanding these fundamental concepts.
- 64-67: The section on "Variable" correctly explains the use of variables in predicates, enhancing the reader's understanding of how queries are constructed.
- 77-81: The description of "Query" and its role in retrieving information from the blockchain is informative and aligns with the module's functionality.
- 83-95: The explanation of the
Ask
message format and its use in submitting queries is clear and provides practical insight into interacting with the module.- 165-173: The "Performance" section appropriately highlights the factors affecting the logic module's performance and offers useful advice on optimizing query and program complexity.
- 183-195: The "Security" section effectively addresses the deterministic nature of the logic module and outlines the measures in place to control resource usage, ensuring the reader understands the module's safe operation.
- 3-3: The term "Protobuf" is flagged as a possible spelling mistake. In this context, "Protobuf" refers to Google's Protocol Buffers, so the usage is correct.
- 9-9: The term "Prolog" is flagged as a possible spelling mistake. "Prolog" is correctly used here as it refers to the programming language.
- 52-52: The term "nobody" suggested as a replacement for "no body" is incorrect in this context. The original text correctly describes a fact in Prolog, which indeed has no body.
- 141-141: The term "Prolog" is flagged again as a possible spelling mistake. It is correctly used here as it refers to the programming language.
- 155-157: Repeated whitespaces and a possible missing comma are noted. These are minor formatting issues within the markdown content and do not impact the technical accuracy or readability of the documentation.
- 186-186: The phrase "does not have the ability to submit transactions or make changes to the blockchain's state" is suggested to be rephrased. However, it accurately describes the module's limitations and is clear as is.
- 7-187: The technical descriptions of the logic module, including its implementation, concepts, performance considerations, and security measures, are accurate and provide a comprehensive understanding of the module's functionality.
- 1-506: The structure and formatting of the document are effective in conveying the information clearly and facilitating easy navigation through the content. The use of headings, code snippets, and a Table of Contents enhances readability and user experience.
- 197-229: Ensure that all links in the Table of Contents correctly point to the relevant sections within the document. This facilitates seamless navigation and access to detailed protobuf documentation.
Verification successful
To further verify the correctness and accessibility of the links in the Table of Contents, we need to ensure that the anchor tags corresponding to each link actually exist within the document. This step is crucial for confirming that the links lead to the correct sections when clicked, facilitating seamless navigation.
The verification process confirms that all links in the Table of Contents correctly point to the relevant sections within the document. This ensures seamless navigation and access to detailed protobuf documentation.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the links in the Table of Contents are correctly pointing to the relevant sections. grep -E '\[logic/v1beta2/.+\]\(#logic/v1beta2/.+\)' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.mdLength of output: 390
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the existence of corresponding anchor tags for each link in the Table of Contents. # This script checks for headings that match the anchor tags in the links. # Checking for params.proto section grep -E '^## .*logic/v1beta2/params.proto' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md # Checking for genesis.proto section grep -E '^## .*logic/v1beta2/genesis.proto' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md # Checking for types.proto section grep -E '^## .*logic/v1beta2/types.proto' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md # Checking for query.proto section grep -E '^## .*logic/v1beta2/query.proto' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.md # Checking for tx.proto section grep -E '^## .*logic/v1beta2/tx.proto' modules_versioned_docs/version-v6.0.0/logic.mdLength of output: 599
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Device | URL |
---|---|
desktop | http://localhost:3000/ |
Device | URL |
---|---|
mobile | http://localhost:3000/ |
Not what you expected? Are your scores flaky? GitHub runners could be the cause.
Try running on Foo instead
@coderabbitai, could you kindly generate a ticket summarizing all the suggested changes from this review? The changes will be addressed in a later stage. Thanks. 🙏 |
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @ccamel, based on the review comments and the provided context, here's a summary of the suggested changes for documentation across versions Logic Module
Mint Module
Vesting Module
These changes aim to provide a thorough understanding of the Would you like me to open a new GitHub issue with this summary as a follow-up action? Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# List all review comments on the PR using GitHub CLI
gh pr review list 443 --repo okp4/docs
Length of output: 77 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Correct command to list all review comments on the PR using GitHub CLI
gh pr view 443 --repo okp4/docs --comments
Length of output: 41192 |
Add the (missing) versioned documentation from the okp4/okp4d modules
v4.0.0
,v4.1.0
,v5.0.0
,v6.0.0
,v7.0.0
.Summary by CodeRabbit