Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/trigger service #54

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022
Merged

Feat/trigger service #54

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 20, 2022

Conversation

amimart
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart commented Apr 13, 2022

Add a new trigger-service transaction.

Purpose

The main goal of this first version of the trigger-service transaction is to effectively trigger a service execution in reaction of this specific transaction.

It is mainly oriented to serve test purposes and help in the design definition of a future production oriented version.

Details

The transaction contains only an uri parameter meant to receive service reference & execution parameters. The trigger is not currently stored in the state.

There is no strong validation as the services have actually no existence in the protocol.

@amimart amimart requested a review from ccamel April 13, 2022 13:24
@amimart amimart self-assigned this Apr 13, 2022
@amimart amimart removed the request for review from ccamel April 13, 2022 13:25
@amimart amimart force-pushed the feat/trigger-service branch from 4409dde to b9ae987 Compare April 19, 2022 13:53
@amimart amimart requested review from ccamel and ingvaar April 19, 2022 13:53
@amimart amimart marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2022 13:53
@amimart amimart merged commit 54779ea into main Apr 20, 2022
@amimart amimart deleted the feat/trigger-service branch April 20, 2022 08:19
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants