-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
trie: implement NodeBlob api for trie iterator #584
Merged
huyngopt1994
merged 2 commits into
axieinfinity:path-base-implementing
from
Francesco4203:nodeblob-api-for-trie-iterator
Sep 26, 2024
Merged
trie: implement NodeBlob api for trie iterator #584
huyngopt1994
merged 2 commits into
axieinfinity:path-base-implementing
from
Francesco4203:nodeblob-api-for-trie-iterator
Sep 26, 2024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This functionality is needed in new path-based storage scheme, but can be implemented in a seperate PR though. When an account is deleted, then all the storage slots should be nuked out from the disk as well. In hash-based storage scheme they are still left in the disk but in new scheme, they will be iterated and marked as deleted. But why the NodeBlob API is needed in this scenario? Because when the node is marked deleted, the previous value is also required to be recorded to construct the reverse diff.
Francesco4203
changed the title
Nodeblob api for trie iterator
trie: implement NodeBlob api for trie iterator
Sep 26, 2024
huyngopt1994
approved these changes
Sep 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
huyngopt1994
merged commit Sep 26, 2024
153549f
into
axieinfinity:path-base-implementing
1 check passed
Francesco4203
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2024
* trie: implement NodeBlob API for trie iterator This functionality is needed in new path-based storage scheme, but can be implemented in a seperate PR though. When an account is deleted, then all the storage slots should be nuked out from the disk as well. In hash-based storage scheme they are still left in the disk but in new scheme, they will be iterated and marked as deleted. But why the NodeBlob API is needed in this scenario? Because when the node is marked deleted, the previous value is also required to be recorded to construct the reverse diff. * fuzzers/stacktrie: enable test --------- Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <[email protected]>
huyngopt1994
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
* trie: implement NodeBlob API for trie iterator This functionality is needed in new path-based storage scheme, but can be implemented in a seperate PR though. When an account is deleted, then all the storage slots should be nuked out from the disk as well. In hash-based storage scheme they are still left in the disk but in new scheme, they will be iterated and marked as deleted. But why the NodeBlob API is needed in this scenario? Because when the node is marked deleted, the previous value is also required to be recorded to construct the reverse diff. * fuzzers/stacktrie: enable test --------- Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <[email protected]>
huyngopt1994
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2024
* trie: implement NodeBlob API for trie iterator This functionality is needed in new path-based storage scheme, but can be implemented in a seperate PR though. When an account is deleted, then all the storage slots should be nuked out from the disk as well. In hash-based storage scheme they are still left in the disk but in new scheme, they will be iterated and marked as deleted. But why the NodeBlob API is needed in this scenario? Because when the node is marked deleted, the previous value is also required to be recorded to construct the reverse diff. * fuzzers/stacktrie: enable test --------- Co-authored-by: Gary Rong <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.