Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make db inspector for extending multiple ancient stores #574

Conversation

huyngopt1994
Copy link
Collaborator

@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 commented Sep 16, 2024

ethereum/go-ethereum#25896 Reference, right now we need to implement the deletion tail feature, I leave for returning 0, and nil for err, when calling tail function in Inspecting

@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 force-pushed the make-db-inspector-for-extending-multiple-ancient-stores branch from 47351b1 to 55228df Compare September 16, 2024 16:43
@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 force-pushed the make-db-inspector-for-extending-multiple-ancient-stores branch from 55228df to 5cff5c8 Compare September 17, 2024 04:45
@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 force-pushed the make-db-inspector-for-extending-multiple-ancient-stores branch from 5cff5c8 to df9fed8 Compare September 17, 2024 05:07
@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 merged commit a16a5d0 into path-base-implementing Sep 18, 2024
1 check passed
@huyngopt1994 huyngopt1994 deleted the make-db-inspector-for-extending-multiple-ancient-stores branch September 18, 2024 04:31
huyngopt1994 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2024
* core: add blockchain test for failing create/destroy-case

* core,state: some refactors

* core/rawdb: refactor db inspector for extending multiple ancient store
huyngopt1994 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
* core: add blockchain test for failing create/destroy-case

* core,state: some refactors

* core/rawdb: refactor db inspector for extending multiple ancient store
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants