-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 995
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add arch, os, and provisioner anti-affinities for the karpenter deployment #468
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -59,10 +59,25 @@ spec: | |
nodeSelector: | ||
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }} | ||
{{- end }} | ||
{{- with .Values.controller.affinity }} | ||
affinity: | ||
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }} | ||
{{- end }} | ||
{{- if .Values.controller.affinity }} | ||
{{- toYaml .Values.controller.affinity | nindent 8 }} | ||
{{- else }} | ||
nodeAffinity: | ||
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: | ||
nodeSelectorTerms: | ||
- matchExpressions: | ||
- key: provisioning.karpenter.sh/name | ||
operator: DoesNotExist | ||
- key: kubernetes.io/arch | ||
operator: In | ||
values: | ||
- amd64 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Don't we currently build arm images w/ ko? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The makefile has the flag to generate for all platforms, but I only see the amd64 one in the public registry. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It might be that ecr public just doesn't show the other arch ones ... the manifest appears to have the hashes listed, let me do some digging real quick. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I tested on an arm64 instance and it does appear to pull down an arm64 variant, so I removed the arch affinity. |
||
- key: kubernetes.io/os | ||
operator: In | ||
values: | ||
- linux | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 |
||
{{- end }} | ||
{{- with .Values.controller.tolerations }} | ||
tolerations: | ||
{{- toYaml . | nindent 8 }} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't actually think we want this. Imagine if someone wants to run karpenter in a management cluster, who's nodes are themselves managed by a separate karpenter installation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting, I hadn't considered the case of a management cluster using karpenter... But a karpenter installation should never be hosted on a node provisioned by the installation, right? I can remove this one since it's not super important for people trying it out right now, only slightly annoying when developing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I went ahead and removed this one.