-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 288
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Draft] Group docker simple flow tests to suite #8393
Open
d8660091
wants to merge
1
commit into
aws:main
Choose a base branch
from
d8660091:mt
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ | ||
package e2e | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"strings" | ||
|
||
"github.com/aws/eks-anywhere/pkg/api/v1alpha1" | ||
) | ||
|
||
var kubeVersions = []v1alpha1.KubernetesVersion{v1alpha1.Kube126, v1alpha1.Kube127, v1alpha1.Kube128, v1alpha1.Kube129, v1alpha1.Kube130} | ||
|
||
// Subtest is an interface to represent a test case. | ||
type Subtest interface { | ||
// Return the name of the subtest case. | ||
GetName() string | ||
// Return the name suffix of the parent test, which includes this subtest. It should be "*Suite". | ||
GetSuiteSuffix() string | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Suites contain all test suites. The key is the suite suffix. | ||
var Suites = map[string][]Subtest{ | ||
simpleFlowSubtest.GetSuiteSuffix(): {}, | ||
} | ||
|
||
// SimpleFlowSubtest is a struct to represent a simple flow test. | ||
type SimpleFlowSubtest struct { | ||
KubeVersion v1alpha1.KubernetesVersion | ||
} | ||
|
||
// GetName returns the subtest name. | ||
func (st *SimpleFlowSubtest) GetName() string { | ||
return strings.ReplaceAll(string(st.KubeVersion), ".", "") | ||
} | ||
|
||
// GetSuiteSuffix returns the Suite suffix. | ||
func (st *SimpleFlowSubtest) GetSuiteSuffix() string { | ||
return "SimpleFlowSuite" | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Make sure the SimpleFlowSubtest implements the Subtest interface. | ||
var simpleFlowSubtest Subtest = (*SimpleFlowSubtest)(nil) | ||
|
||
// Init SimpleFlowSuite. | ||
func init() { | ||
s := simpleFlowSubtest.GetSuiteSuffix() | ||
for _, k := range kubeVersions { | ||
Suites[s] = append(Suites[s], &SimpleFlowSubtest{KubeVersion: k}) | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I want to see a mock of this method that handles all OSs and Providers, you dont have to make it work out of the gate, but Id like to see it so we can iterate on the design here before rolling this out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Guillermo has made one showing how the suite handles OSs and Providers: https://github.com/aws/eks-anywhere/compare/main...g-gaston:eks-anywhere:poc-multi-test?expand=1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a gut feeling, parameterizing provider could make the e2e test harder to write and maintain, which should be as simple as a test yaml file + "eksa create cluster". I am OK with parameterize OS though