You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
EKS Version issues attract a lot of off-topic comments and conversation. I would ask that the maintainers of the repo consider locking the "Support for Kubernetes X" issues to comments and providing updates to cut down on the noise for those of us here who want to follow developments from AWS regarding these features.
@RyPeck I would encourage the maintainers to leave it open and hear their customers' feedback, even if it's not pleasant to hear. Read Amazon's leadership principle, specifically "Customer Obsession".
Please keep these discussions open. They are useful for people already using EKS, and fior those considering whether to use EKS or not. The slow support for upstream versions is a major consideration for me, along with the AWS CNI plugin limiting number of IP addresses per node.
As a compromise, how about two issues - one locked for EKS team updates only, and one for customer feedback/comments?
EKS Version issues attract a lot of off-topic comments and conversation. I would ask that the maintainers of the repo consider locking the "Support for Kubernetes X" issues to comments and providing updates to cut down on the noise for those of us here who want to follow developments from AWS regarding these features.
https://help.github.com/en/github/building-a-strong-community/locking-conversations
#380
#487
#697
EDIT - @rdonkin compromise suggestion is a better idea imho - #765 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: