-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Verify contentinfo content is NULL is handled #1428
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, would be good to include details on how test files were generated.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1428 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 76.87% 76.86% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 425 425
Lines 71527 71527
==========================================
- Hits 54985 54979 -6
- Misses 16542 16548 +6 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
cc2c0af
to
8242ae2
Compare
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7292#section-4.1; a sequence of | ||
// ContentInfo's, where each Content field is Optional, again per RFC2315. We do | ||
// not support this case either, the field cannot be absent. | ||
// Below two test fixtures validates the above. See V1217527752. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would referencing CVE-2024-0727 from OpenSSL provide more context for external consumers?
Issues:
V1217527752
Description of changes:
See code description and reference above.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and the ISC license.