Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify contentinfo content is NULL is handled #1428

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

torben-hansen
Copy link
Contributor

Issues:

V1217527752

Description of changes:

See code description and reference above.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and the ISC license.

@torben-hansen torben-hansen requested a review from a team as a code owner January 31, 2024 17:04
Copy link
Contributor

@WillChilds-Klein WillChilds-Klein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, would be good to include details on how test files were generated.

crypto/pkcs8/pkcs12_test.cc Show resolved Hide resolved
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (67d3e50) 76.87% compared to head (cc2c0af) 76.86%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1428      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.87%   76.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         425      425              
  Lines       71527    71527              
==========================================
- Hits        54985    54979       -6     
- Misses      16542    16548       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@torben-hansen torben-hansen requested review from samuel40791765 and removed request for andrewhop February 2, 2024 15:52
// https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7292#section-4.1; a sequence of
// ContentInfo's, where each Content field is Optional, again per RFC2315. We do
// not support this case either, the field cannot be absent.
// Below two test fixtures validates the above. See V1217527752.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would referencing CVE-2024-0727 from OpenSSL provide more context for external consumers?

@torben-hansen torben-hansen merged commit 56def5a into aws:main Feb 2, 2024
38 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants