Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(stepfunctions): allow condition on array #4340

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2019

Conversation

jogold
Copy link
Contributor

@jogold jogold commented Oct 2, 2019

A Choice state after a Parallel state receives an array as input.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

A Choice state after a Parallel state receives an array as input.
@jogold jogold requested a review from eladb as a code owner October 2, 2019 13:08
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 2, 2019

Thanks so much for taking the time to contribute to the AWS CDK ❤️

We will shortly assign someone to review this pull request and help get it
merged. In the meantime, please take a minute to make sure you follow this
checklist
:

  • PR title type(scope): text
    • type: fix, feat, refactor go into CHANGELOG, chore is hidden
    • scope: name of module without aws- or cdk- prefix or postfix (e.g. s3 instead of aws-s3-deployment)
    • text: use all lower-case, do not end with a period, do not include issue refs
  • PR Description
    • Rationale: describe rationale of change and approach taken
    • Issues: indicate issues fixed via: fixes #xxx or closes #xxx
    • Breaking?: last paragraph: BREAKING CHANGE: <describe what changed + link for details>
  • Testing
    • Unit test added. Prefer to add a new test rather than modify existing tests
    • CLI or init templates change? Re-run/add CLI integration tests
  • Documentation
    • README: update module README to describe new features
    • API docs: public APIs must be documented. Copy from official AWS docs when possible
    • Design: for significant features, follow design process

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ enum CompoundOperator {
class VariableComparison extends Condition {
constructor(private readonly variable: string, private readonly comparisonOperator: ComparisonOperator, private readonly value: any) {
super();
if (!variable.startsWith('$.')) {
throw new Error(`Variable reference must start with '$.', got '${variable}'`);
if (!variable.startsWith('$.') && !variable.startsWith('$[')) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was curious about the performance implications of using two startsWith vs. a single RegExp, and it seems like the latter is 57% faster on Chrome 77.

Not a change request by any means, just sharing 😄

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, even faster when using .test instead of .match: https://jsperf.com/str-startswith-vs-regex/2, updated PR

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh wow, I didn't expect the gain to be this big with .test(.
I also picked a worst case scenario for startsWith using $a as a test.

But anyway, thanks for nitpick-y change 👍

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 2, 2019

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request is now being automatically merged.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 47203f4 into aws:master Oct 2, 2019
@jogold jogold deleted the sfn-condition-array branch October 24, 2019 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants