-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(codepipeline-actions): support InspectorEcrImageScanAction
and InspectorSourceCodeScanAction
actions
#33378
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #33378 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 80.92% 81.00% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 236 238 +2
Lines 14256 14271 +15
Branches 2491 2492 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 11537 11560 +23
+ Misses 2434 2425 -9
- Partials 285 286 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
action
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actionEcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actions
EcrImageScanAction
and SourceCodeScanAction
actionsInspectorEcrImageScanAction
and InspectorSourceCodeScanAction
actions
test('can get variables', () => { | ||
// WHEN | ||
const inspectorEcrImageScanAction = new cpactions.InspectorEcrImageScanAction({ | ||
actionName: 'InspectorScan', | ||
output: scanOutput, | ||
repository, | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// THEN | ||
expect(inspectorEcrImageScanAction.variables.highestScannedSeverity).toMatch(/^#{\${Token\[TOKEN\.[0-9]*\]}.HighestScannedSeverity}$/); | ||
}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This and other common code are about the common behavior of the base class.
But as users are not aware of the base class because they call the subclasses directly, and in case there are any changes by contributors, it is also confirmation for regressions in the subclasses. Therefore, the tests in inspector-ecr-image-scan-action.test.ts
and inspector-source-code-scan-action.test.ts
are partially identical.
This also makes the test useful even if the base class is deleted and each class is implemented independently in the future.
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(This review is outdated)
Exemption Request:
Should already have written unit tests that cover the code I have added. |
✅ Updated pull request passes all PRLinter validations. Dismissing previous PRLinter review.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request linter fails with the following errors:
❌ CodeCov is indicating a drop in code coverage
If you believe this pull request should receive an exemption, please comment and provide a justification. A comment requesting an exemption should contain the text Exemption Request
. Additionally, if clarification is needed, add Clarification Request
to a comment.
✅ A exemption request has been requested. Please wait for a maintainer's review.
AWS CodeBuild CI Report
Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository |
* Valid values are medium | high | critical. | ||
*/ | ||
readonly highestScannedSeverity: string; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not input to the construct, but output from the pipeline, which is a string formatted with the variableExpression
method. Therefore, it cannot be an enum.
// This permission was not listed in the above reference, but without it, | ||
// an error would occur since `ecr get-login-password` is executed in the action. | ||
options.role.addToPrincipalPolicy(new iam.PolicyStatement({ | ||
resources: ['*'], | ||
actions: [ | ||
'ecr:GetAuthorizationToken', | ||
], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error message by CFn requested a wildcard for resources.
Issue # (if applicable)
Closes #33377.
Reason for this change
AWS CodePipeline introduces new build action: InspectorScan action.
Description of changes
Add
InspectorEcrImageScanAction
andInspectorSourceCodeScanAction
classes that extendsBaseInspectorScan
class.The
BaseInspectorScan
class that extendsAction
class to aws-codepipeline-actions module.Describe any new or updated permissions being added
Description of how you validated changes
Both unit and integ tests
Checklist
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license