Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(scheduler-targets-alpha): kinesis data firehose target uses l1 instead of l2 #32150

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 17, 2024

Conversation

gracelu0
Copy link
Contributor

@gracelu0 gracelu0 commented Nov 15, 2024

Issue # (if applicable)

Tracking #31785

Reason for this change

Since the Kinesis Data Firehose Alpha module is in developer preview and contains the L2 construct for a Firehose Delivery Stream, we should make this upgrade from L1 to L2 now while the module is experimental instead of in the future, where we would need to add a V2 for this target (like for event targets, see #30189) to avoid breaking customers.

Description of changes

Replace CfnDeliveryStream with IDeliveryStream. The L1 uses S3DestinationConfiguration property whereas the L2 uses ExtendedS3DestinationConfiguration property (includes additional fields on top of S3DestinationConfiguration fields). According to
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSCloudFormation/latest/UserGuide/aws-resource-kinesisfirehose-deliverystream.html, "If you change the delivery stream destination from an Amazon S3 destination to an Amazon ES destination, update requires some interruptions."

Description of how you validated changes

  • Updated unit tests and integration test
  • Deployed locally using CfnDeliveryStream then IDeliveryStream and verified the objects are written to the S3 bucket.

Checklist


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache-2.0 license

BREAKING CHANGE: KinesisDataFirehosePutRecord scheduler target now accepts IDeliveryStream instead of CfnDeliveryStream.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the p2 label Nov 15, 2024
@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation requested a review from a team November 15, 2024 10:42
@mergify mergify bot added the contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. label Nov 15, 2024

beforeEach(() => {
app = new App({ context: { '@aws-cdk/aws-iam:minimizePolicies': true } });
stack = new Stack(app, 'Stack', { env: { region: 'us-east-1', account: '123456789012' } });
firehose = new CfnDeliveryStream(stack, 'MyFirehose');
mockS3Destination = {
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gracelu0 gracelu0 Nov 15, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.18%. Comparing base (50d11a3) to head (e377524).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #32150   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.18%   77.18%           
=======================================
  Files         105      105           
  Lines        7163     7163           
  Branches     1311     1311           
=======================================
  Hits         5529     5529           
  Misses       1454     1454           
  Partials      180      180           
Flag Coverage Δ
suite.unit 77.18% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
packages/aws-cdk 77.18% <ø> (ø)

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation added the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Nov 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@aws-cdk-automation aws-cdk-automation removed the pr/needs-maintainer-review This PR needs a review from a Core Team Member label Nov 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

@mrgrain
Copy link
Contributor

mrgrain commented Nov 17, 2024

@Mergifyio update

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 17, 2024

update

☑️ Nothing to do

  • queue-position = -1 [📌 update requirement]
  • #commits-behind > 0 [📌 update requirement]
  • -closed [📌 update requirement]
  • -conflict [📌 update requirement]

@aws-cdk-automation
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: AutoBuildv2Project1C6BFA3F-wQm2hXv2jqQv
  • Commit ID: e377524
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 11384f0 into aws:main Nov 17, 2024
17 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Thank you for contributing! Your pull request will be updated from main and then merged automatically (do not update manually, and be sure to allow changes to be pushed to your fork).

Copy link

Comments on closed issues and PRs are hard for our team to see.
If you need help, please open a new issue that references this one.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
contribution/core This is a PR that came from AWS. p2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants