-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(iam): avoid duplicate statements in policy documents #2254
Merged
Merged
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4c24fb3
feat(iam): remove duplicate statements from policy documents
jogold dec38e4
remove duplicate check in log retention
jogold fb71270
fix codepipeline-actions integ test
jogold 0baa26a
prevent adding duplicate statement
jogold 8a0c36c
implement IResolvedValuePostProcessor
jogold 185edd0
jsdoc
jogold 2afd5d3
add unit test with base document
jogold 94028c1
use a set for jsonStatements
jogold c421907
add note
jogold File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -39,16 +39,14 @@ export class LogRetention extends cdk.Construct { | |
lambdaPurpose: 'LogRetention', | ||
}); | ||
|
||
if (provider.role && !provider.role.node.tryFindChild('DefaultPolicy')) { // Avoid duplicate statements | ||
provider.role.addToPolicy( | ||
new iam.PolicyStatement() | ||
.addActions('logs:PutRetentionPolicy', 'logs:DeleteRetentionPolicy') | ||
// We need '*' here because we will also put a retention policy on | ||
// the log group of the provider function. Referencing it's name | ||
// creates a CF circular dependency. | ||
.addAllResources() | ||
); | ||
} | ||
provider.addToRolePolicy( | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. add a note here that duplicate statements will be deduplicated by |
||
new iam.PolicyStatement() | ||
.addActions('logs:PutRetentionPolicy', 'logs:DeleteRetentionPolicy') | ||
// We need '*' here because we will also put a retention policy on | ||
// the log group of the provider function. Referencing it's name | ||
// creates a CF circular dependency. | ||
.addAllResources() | ||
); | ||
|
||
// Need to use a CfnResource here to prevent lerna dependency cycles | ||
// @aws-cdk/aws-cloudformation -> @aws-cdk/aws-lambda -> @aws-cdk/aws-cloudformation | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the idea of having a
hash
for a statement, but this is actually not necessary for comparison purposes (JSON.stringify(this.toJson())
is sufficient). Opinions?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is IAM, which is sensitive, so I am definitely not comfortable with the idea of making a hash-comparison, because in the improbable cause of a collision, it'll have awkward consequences.
I am however not sure that
JSON.stringify
will work though, as there can be any amount of unresolvedToken
s here that may or may not be represented by the samestring
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this is the case then the comparison will fail and it will leave the statements as is, which is suboptimal but safe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIRC,
toJson
will throw in this case...