Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix pipeline notebook instance_type #3435

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 1, 2022
Merged

Conversation

qidewenwhen
Copy link
Member

Description of changes: After this Sagemaker SDK change, in some cases instance_type is not parametrizable since if image_uri is not given, any type of Processor or EstimatorBase will use instance_type to retrieve image_uris in Python SDK, in which case, instance_type should not be parameterized with PipelineVariable

Testing done: notebook tests

Merge Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your pull request.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc and adhered to the example notebook best practices
  • I have updated any necessary documentation, including READMEs
  • I have tested my notebook(s) and ensured it runs end-to-end
  • I have linted my notebook(s) and code using tox -e black-format,black-nb-format

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-code-formatting
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-code-formatting
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-link-check
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-link-check
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-grammar
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: sagemaker-examples-grammar
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: FAILED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@sagemaker-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: amazon-sagemaker-examples-pr
  • Commit ID: 77f7ad7
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@jkroll-aws jkroll-aws merged commit aa0e8ad into aws:main Jun 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants