-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Cookiecutter project template with TypeScript Powertools setup (with SAM) #391
Comments
Here some references of cookiecutter-based project from Python & Java. If using SAM cookiecutter is nice, as alternative I'd like to also pitch creating a projen template (they accept PRs to add templates) for those who don't use SAM & just want a nice TS setup. |
@dreamorosi sam now supports Typescript. So it might be a good time to add this :) |
See aws/aws-sam-cli-app-templates#193 To manage expectations: this is still in a preliminary phase as TS was just added to SAM and there's a few things we want to settle on our side before merging that PR, but we're on it. |
@michaelbrewer, do you have a link describing typescript support in SAM? Looking forward to seeing this solution come alive, till then I will be using JS |
Hi @VRMink, we have added an example that uses SAM & TypeScript to this repo, you can find it under A cookiecutter template for SAM it's also on its way aws/aws-sam-cli-app-templates#193. |
|
Description of the feature request
Problem statement
Setting up in TypeScript development environment is difficult and require a lot of manual steps. For users who want to test PowerTool without integrating it into an existing TypeScript project, it could take a very long time (hours, or even days to get config right).
Summary of the feature
We provide a Cookiecutter template with TypeScript PowerTool already setup. It has API + 3 functions that uses all 3 core features
Each function will use the following options:
Code examples
sam init --location gh:aws-samples/cookiecutter-aws-sam-typescript-with-powertools
Ref documentation
Benefits for you and the wider AWS community
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
Related issues, RFCs
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: