Maintenance: reach 100% JMESPath test coverage & spec compliance

[dreamorosi]

Summary

As part of the JMESPath utility implementation we should add test coverage and compliance according to the official compliance test suite that can be found here.

Why is this needed?

So that we can have a modicum of confidence that the utility behaves according to the specification.

Which area does this relate to?

Tests

Solution

No response

Acknowledgment

• This request meets Powertools for AWS Lambda (TypeScript) Tenets
• Should this be considered in other Powertools for AWS Lambda languages? i.e. Python, Java, and .NET

Future readers

Please react with 👍 and your use case to help us understand customer demand.

[github-actions]

⚠️ COMMENT VISIBILITY WARNING ⚠️

This issue is now closed. Please be mindful that future comments are hard for our team to see.

If you need more assistance, please either tag a team member or open a new issue that references this one.

If you wish to keep having a conversation with other community members under this issue feel free to do so.

[github-actions]

This is now released under v2.0.4 version!