fix(parser): API Gateway V2 request context scope field should be optional

[leandrodamascena]

Issue number: #2953

Summary

Changes

Include the Optional type to make the "scope" field optional.

User experience

Please share what the user experience looks like before and after this change

Checklist

If your change doesn't seem to apply, please leave them unchecked.

• Meet tenets criteria
• I have performed a self-review of this change
• Changes have been tested
• Changes are documented
• PR title follows conventional commit semantics

Is this a breaking change?

RFC issue number:

Checklist:

• Migration process documented
• Implement warnings (if it can live side by side)

Acknowledgment

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.07% 🎉

Comparison is base (dbd80cf) 96.48% compared to head (e4726a4) 96.56%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2961      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    96.48%   96.56%   +0.07%     
===========================================
  Files          175      175              
  Lines         7825     7825              
  Branches      1476     1476              
===========================================
+ Hits          7550     7556       +6     
+ Misses         220      217       -3     
+ Partials        55       52       -3     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
...mbda_powertools/utilities/parser/models/apigwv2.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[heitorlessa]

tiny test to avoid regressions

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information