Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase logic of boto automation #3818

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

kddejong
Copy link
Contributor

@kddejong kddejong commented Nov 8, 2024

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

  • This increases the logic for boto automation. We can now look at properties inside of arrays

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.77%. Comparing base (c5b4c21) to head (1422aee).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3818      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.78%   93.77%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         363      363              
  Lines       12445    12448       +3     
  Branches     2553     2553              
==========================================
+ Hits        11671    11673       +2     
  Misses        429      429              
- Partials      345      346       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 93.73% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kddejong kddejong merged commit f3e0699 into aws-cloudformation:main Nov 12, 2024
24 of 25 checks passed
@kddejong kddejong deleted the feature/boto/arrayitems branch November 12, 2024 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant