Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conditionally sync the branches #369

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Conversation

draftcode
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Current Aviator status

Aviator will automatically update this comment as the status of the PR changes.
Comment /aviator refresh to force Aviator to re-examine your PR (or learn about other /aviator commands).

This PR was merged using Aviator.


See the real-time status of this PR on the Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension to see the status of your PR within GitHub.

Copy link
Contributor

aviator-app bot commented Jul 29, 2024

FlexReview Summary

Based on the code complexity and the author's expertise score, these are the suggested reviewers:

  • @jainankit (current review load: 0)

See the list of alternate reviewers in the detailed breakdown below.

Detailed Breakdown Author’s expertise score for the modified files:
  • cmd/av/stack_sync.go (1.00)
  • docs/av-stack-sync.1.md (1.00)
  • internal/sequencer/planner/planner.go (1.00)
Files Reviewers
cmd/av/stack_sync.go †,
docs/av-stack-sync.1.md †,
internal/sequencer/planner/planner.go
@jainankit (score: 0.77, current review load: 0)

† Indicates that the file doesn't need an expert review. (?)

See full breakdown of the reviewers on the Aviator webapp.

@aviator-app aviator-app bot requested a review from jainankit July 29, 2024 23:30
@aviator-app aviator-app bot merged commit bbc4a3b into master Jul 31, 2024
4 checks passed
@aviator-app aviator-app bot deleted the conditionally_stack_sync branch July 31, 2024 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants