Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: add Docker Usage Instructions to README.md #1424

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

containerman17
Copy link

Why this should be merged

The README.md currently lacks instructions on running subnet-evm using Docker. Adding a Docker section will help users set up and configure subnet-evm easily in containerized environments.

How this works

Added a new Run in Docker section to the README.md with brief instructions on configuration, data persistence, updating, networking, and example setups for both a Fuji subnet validator and RPC server.

How this was tested

I tested the examples manually.

Need to be documented?

No additional documentation is needed; all information is included in the updated README.md.

Need to update RELEASES.md?

No update to RELEASES.md is necessary since this is a documentation addition.

@containerman17 containerman17 requested review from ceyonur, darioush and a team as code owners January 16, 2025 04:33
@containerman17 containerman17 changed the title Add Docker Usage Instructions to README.md chore: add Docker Usage Instructions to README.md Jan 16, 2025
@martineckardt
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@qdm12 qdm12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! 💯

Just a few questions/comments to try to make this as simple as possible!

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

### Updating

Run `docker stop avago; docker rm avago;` then start a new container with the latest version tag in your `docker run` command.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit (or maybe && is more appropriate)

Suggested change
Run `docker stop avago; docker rm avago;` then start a new container with the latest version tag in your `docker run` command.
Run `docker stop avago; docker rm avago` then start a new container with the latest version tag in your `docker run` command.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would keep ; for idempotency. It doesn’t make an actual difference since docker stop always returns zero, but ; makes a clear statement: "all commands will execute no matter what."

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
- `AVAGO_HTTP_PORT` is set to `8080` instead of `9650` to avoid conflicts with the validator.
- `AVAGO_HTTP_ALLOWED_HOSTS` and `AVAGO_HTTP_HOST` are required to allow the RPC server to be accessed from outside. You'll need to secure it with HTTPS; Caddy is recommended.

RPC example uses another folder `~/.avalanchego_rpc` to avoid conflicts with the validator if you want to run both on the same machine.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

curious is it common / recommended to run both on the same machine?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don’t see why not. It’s a trusted binary, so Docker-level isolation should be enough, as long as you have sufficient resources. Subnet-EVM without X and C chains doesn’t require much. Would I run it on the same machine for DFK? Probably not. But for 95% of other networks, especially on Fuji, I don’t see an issue.

Actually, that raises another question—why is it not recommended to run the same node as both a validator and a public RPC node?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants