Fix typo and link formatting in FAQ

[PGijsbers]

As per title.

[eddiebergman]

Looks good, thank you very much for the doc fixes, very much appreciated!

Just going to run a quick check to make sure doc still builds correctly

[eddiebergman]

Hmm they're failing to build but it appears to be unrelated, seperate issue that we need to address.

@mfeurer Am I okay to merge simple doc changes such as this?

[mfeurer]

Yes, they appear unrelated, you can go ahead an squash merge this thingy.

[PGijsbers]

I'm confused, looks like Matthias suggested a merge instead of closing without?

[eddiebergman]

Was there more fixes? I can go ahead and reopen the branch. That was my bad as I assumed that was it for the PR

[PGijsbers]

No there wouldn't be any more commits to this branch, because from my understanding Matthias was fine with merging this as-is (and I assume tackle the doc build issues in a separate PR by whomever takes that up).

[eddiebergman]

Ahh okay, yes I documented it in (#1196). We're trying to get some long term plans for auto-sklearn done at the moment but we'll get back to it soon!

[mfeurer]

Sorry, my comment was a bit too brief. I'm fine with you merging this, @eddiebergman. And I think the test failures are unrelated to these changes.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1195 (38bcba7) into development (96b9ad0) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           development    #1195   +/-   ##
============================================
  Coverage        88.15%   88.16%           
============================================
  Files              138      138           
  Lines            10866    10866           
============================================
+ Hits              9579     9580    +1     
+ Misses            1287     1286    -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ature_preprocessing/select_rates_classification.py	85.91% <0.00%> (-1.41%)	⬇️
...learn/pipeline/components/regression/libsvm_svr.py	90.24% <0.00%> (-1.22%)	⬇️
...ine/components/feature_preprocessing/kernel_pca.py	96.49% <0.00%> (+1.75%)	⬆️
...eline/components/feature_preprocessing/fast_ica.py	97.82% <0.00%> (+4.34%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96b9ad0...38bcba7. Read the comment docs.

[eddiebergman]

@PGijsbers @mfeurer I realise the confusion now ... I thought I hit merge but apparently not -_-

My bad!

[PGijsbers]

Don't worry about it, glad it's resolved!