Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Various review feedback for ESLint configuration #204

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 28, 2023

Conversation

jonkoops
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains some changes for the ESLint configuration based on what my review for #200 would have been.

@jonkoops jonkoops requested a review from a team as a code owner August 27, 2023 13:40
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
.prettierrc Outdated
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've removed the Prettier config, since the default should be good enough. This leads to some code formatting changes, but nothing significant. Also the singleQuote option seems to have no impact anyways, presumably as this is already overwritten at the ESLint level.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's not use 80 chars for printwidth and set it back to 100.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, added a commit to restore this.

@frederikprijck frederikprijck merged commit ba75e46 into auth0:beta Aug 28, 2023
@jonkoops jonkoops deleted the eslint-feedback branch August 28, 2023 20:13
frederikprijck added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants