-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Miscellaneous test coverage improvements #719
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #719 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.60% 69.79% +1.18%
==========================================
Files 87 87
Lines 11239 11192 -47
==========================================
+ Hits 7711 7811 +100
+ Misses 3016 2867 -149
- Partials 512 514 +2
... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
assert.Len(t, stdout.Bytes(), 0) | ||
}) | ||
|
||
t.Run("Stream successfully", func(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we have an assert in this test?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for spotting that! 👍🏻 Improved in 59e23d8
(#719).
59e23d8
to
21e9cf8
Compare
🔧 Changes
Numerous unit tests, integration tests, code removal and subtle refactoring to increase the code coverage measurement. These are changes that are too small to exist on their own.
🔬 Testing
All tests pass.
📝 Checklist