Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dispatch decomposition using BD tree #103

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

guimarqu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 27, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #103 into master will decrease coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #103      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.51%   90.29%   -0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        1529     1535       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         1384     1386       +2     
- Misses        145      149       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/problem.jl 96% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/decomposition.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/MOIwrapper.jl 90.21% <100%> (+0.1%) ⬆️
src/algorithms/reformulationsolver.jl 90.98% <0%> (-2.46%) ⬇️
src/node.jl 86.59% <0%> (-1.04%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4dbf288...262ec0b. Read the comment docs.

@guimarqu guimarqu requested a review from vitornesello May 28, 2019 08:37
@guimarqu guimarqu changed the title WIP : Dispatch decomposition using BD tree Dispatch decomposition using BD tree May 28, 2019
@guimarqu guimarqu merged commit 25dab60 into master May 28, 2019
@guimarqu guimarqu deleted the dispatch_decomposition branch May 28, 2019 09:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants