You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello to all.
While implementing the Capacitated Lot-sizing Problem with coluna I noticed that the convexity constraints are imposing a lb of 0 and a ub of 1. Thus, as for this problem I should have lb = ub = 1 in such constraints, the application does not work correctly, resulting in a solution value equal to zero.
I changed the rhs of the lower bound convexity constraint from 0 to 1 in decomposition.jl and it worked.
Having lb = ub = 1 in the convexity constraints is generic for column generation or coluna should have some way to set the sense of the convexity constraint?
Application is available in: https://github.com/hhkramer/ColunaCodes/tree/master/clsp
Best regards,
Hugo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello to all.
While implementing the Capacitated Lot-sizing Problem with coluna I noticed that the convexity constraints are imposing a lb of 0 and a ub of 1. Thus, as for this problem I should have lb = ub = 1 in such constraints, the application does not work correctly, resulting in a solution value equal to zero.
I changed the rhs of the lower bound convexity constraint from 0 to 1 in decomposition.jl and it worked.
Having lb = ub = 1 in the convexity constraints is generic for column generation or coluna should have some way to set the sense of the convexity constraint?
Application is available in: https://github.com/hhkramer/ColunaCodes/tree/master/clsp
Best regards,
Hugo
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: