Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: inconsistent padding in the accordion in responsive conditions #3280

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024

Conversation

ManikantaMandala
Copy link
Contributor

@ManikantaMandala ManikantaMandala commented Oct 9, 2024

it fixes #3250

before
image
after
image

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style

    • Updated the MenuBlocks component to use a <div> element for better structure and styling.
    • Adjusted class names for improved layout of menu items.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the URL reference in the TypeScript documentation comment for accuracy.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the MenuBlocks component located in components/navigation/MenuBlocks.tsx. The outermost fragment has been replaced with a <div> element that has a class of py-2, which alters the structure of the rendered output without affecting the internal logic or functionality of the component. Additionally, a comment in next-env.d.ts has been updated to reflect a new URL for the Next.js TypeScript documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/navigation/MenuBlocks.tsx Changed outer fragment to a <div> with class py-2 and updated <span> class name.
next-env.d.ts Updated URL reference in a comment for Next.js TypeScript documentation.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Consistent padding in the accordion in responsive conditions (#3250) The changes do not address the padding issue described.

🐰 In the menu, a change we see,
A div with padding, oh so free!
No more fragments, just a cozy space,
For items to gather, in their rightful place.
Hopping forward, we’ll fix the rest,
To make our accordions truly the best! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 712c934
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/67248f219f69f800081f9747
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3280--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

@ManikantaMandala ManikantaMandala changed the title fix: Inconsistent padding in the accordion in responsive conditions fix: inconsistent padding in the accordion in responsive conditions Oct 9, 2024
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Oct 9, 2024

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 40
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3280--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/navigation/MenuBlocks.tsx (1)

Line range hint 31-69: Consider semantic HTML and accessibility improvements.

While the current changes address the padding issue, consider the following suggestions to enhance the component's semantic structure and accessibility:

  1. Use a more semantic HTML element for the menu container, such as <nav> or <ul>, instead of a generic <div>.
  2. If using <ul>, wrap each menu item in an <li> element.
  3. Add appropriate ARIA attributes to improve screen reader navigation, such as role="menu" for the container and role="menuitem" for each item.

Example refactoring:

<nav className="py-2" role="menu">
  <ul className="list-none p-0">
    {items.map((item, index) => (
      <li key={index} role="none">
        <LinkComponent
          href={item.comingSoon ? '' : item.href}
          role="menuitem"
          // ... other props
        >
          {/* ... existing content */}
        </LinkComponent>
      </li>
    ))}
  </ul>
</nav>

These changes would improve the semantic structure and accessibility of the component without affecting its visual appearance or functionality.

Would you like me to create a separate issue to track these accessibility improvements?

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 33-33: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e31739 and fbb83bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/navigation/MenuBlocks.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/navigation/MenuBlocks.tsx (3)

31-31: LGTM! Verify padding consistency across screen sizes.

The addition of the py-2 class to the wrapper <div> should help address the inconsistent padding issue in the accordion. This change adds vertical padding to the menu blocks container, which aligns with the PR objective.

To ensure this change resolves the issue across all screen sizes, please verify the padding consistency on various devices and screen resolutions. Consider adding responsive design tests if not already in place.


69-69: LGTM! Proper closure of the wrapper div.

The closing </div> tag is correctly placed, ensuring that all menu items are enclosed within the wrapper. This maintains the structural integrity of the component.


Line range hint 1-71: Overall assessment: Changes look good with minor suggestions for improvement.

The modifications made to the MenuBlocks component effectively address the inconsistent padding issue in the accordion for responsive conditions. The addition of the py-2 class to a wrapper <div> is a minimal change that should resolve the problem without affecting the core functionality of the component.

Key points:

  1. The changes align with the PR objectives.
  2. The core logic and rendering of menu items remain intact.
  3. Suggestions for improving accessibility and semantic HTML structure have been provided.

Next steps:

  1. Verify the padding consistency across various screen sizes and devices.
  2. Consider implementing the suggested accessibility improvements in a future update.

Overall, these changes are approved and should be ready for merging once the padding consistency is verified across different screen sizes.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome

[error] 33-33: Change to an optional chain.

Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.

(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)

@sambhavgupta0705
Copy link
Member

/update

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.14%. Comparing base (983c80e) to head (712c934).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3280   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   49.14%   49.14%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines         647      647           
=======================================
  Hits          318      318           
  Misses        329      329           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@sambhavgupta0705 sambhavgupta0705 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@asyncapi-bot asyncapi-bot merged commit 1f974ec into asyncapi:master Nov 1, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG]: inconsistent padding in the accordian in responsive conditions
4 participants