Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: only run workflows when necessary #624

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 13, 2022

Conversation

jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Description
Adds checks to blackbox tests and coverall to ensure they only run when necessary.

Related issue(s)
See asyncapi/.github#116 (comment)

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 9, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1834460364

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.542%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1834459123: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2459
Relevant Lines: 2505

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! :)

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member Author

/rtm

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni merged commit b3c10bf into asyncapi:master Feb 13, 2022
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni deleted the feature/skip_ci_in_docs branch February 13, 2022 00:04
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.48.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-next.23 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants