Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pydoclint] Implement fewer arguments (DOC101) #14286

Closed

Conversation

jamesfricker
Copy link

@jamesfricker jamesfricker commented Nov 11, 2024

Summary

Implement DOC101 for pydoclint

https://jsh9.github.io/pydoclint/violation_codes.html#1-doc1xx-violations-about-input-arguments

(First time ruff contribution!)

Since this is a new rule, I'm probably missing some documentation somewhere.

Test Plan

Unit tests.

@jamesfricker jamesfricker changed the title doc101 [pydoclint] Implement fewer arguments (DOC101) Nov 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

@jamesfricker
Copy link
Author

turns out that

closing 😁

@jamesfricker jamesfricker deleted the feat/pydoclint-doc101 branch November 12, 2024 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant