Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add Dify to Ruff users #12593

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2024
Merged

Add Dify to Ruff users #12593

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2024

Conversation

bowenliang123
Copy link
Contributor

@bowenliang123 bowenliang123 commented Jul 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Summary

Test Plan

@bowenliang123 bowenliang123 changed the title add Dify to user list doc: add Dify to user list Jul 31, 2024
@bowenliang123 bowenliang123 changed the title doc: add Dify to user list Add Dify to Ruff users Jul 31, 2024
@bowenliang123
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @charliermarsh

charliermarsh
charliermarsh approved these changes Jul 31, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@charliermarsh charliermarsh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@charliermarsh charliermarsh added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jul 31, 2024
@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit a44d579 into astral-sh:main Jul 31, 2024
19 checks passed
@bowenliang123 bowenliang123 deleted the dify branch July 31, 2024 13:01
@bowenliang123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for such a great tool bringing irreplaceable value to the Python projects and LLM apps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@charliermarsh charliermarsh charliermarsh approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@bowenliang123 @charliermarsh