Consider more stdlib decorators to be property-like #12583
Merged
+70
−1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR is stacked on top of #12581.
We currently consider
@builtins.property
and@functools.cached_property
to be "property-like" decorators, but there are several other similar stdlib decorators that it makes sense to consider when it comes to whether a decorated function has property-like semantics:enum.property
,abc.abstractproperty
andtypes.DynamicClassAttribute
. This PR updatesruff_python_semantic::analyze::visibility::is_property
to consider those as well.Test Plan
Added some fixtures.
cargo test
.