Fix SIM102

crates/ruff/resources/test/fixtures/flake8_simplify/SIM102.py

@@ -156,3 +156,12 @@
 if True:
     if a:
         pass
+
+
+# SIM102
+def f():
+    if a:
+        pass
+    elif b:
+        if c:
+            d

crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_simplify/rules/fix_if.rs

@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ pub(crate) fn fix_nested_if_statements(
 
     // If this is an `elif`, we have to remove the `elif` keyword for now. (We'll
     // restore the `el` later on.)
-    let is_elif = contents.starts_with("elif");
+    let is_elif = contents.trim_start().starts_with("elif");
     let module_text = if is_elif {
         Cow::Owned(contents.replacen("elif", "if", 1))
     } else {

crates/ruff/src/rules/flake8_simplify/snapshots/ruff__rules__flake8_simplify__tests__SIM102_SIM102.py.snap

@@ -332,4 +332,26 @@ SIM102.py:132:5: SIM102 [*] Use a single `if` statement instead of nested `if` s
 136 135 |     print("bar")
 137 136 | 
 
+SIM102.py:165:5: SIM102 [*] Use a single `if` statement instead of nested `if` statements
+    |
+163 |       if a:
+164 |           pass
+165 |       elif b:
+    |  _____^
+166 | |         if c:
+    | |_____________^ SIM102
+167 |               d
+    |
+    = help: Combine `if` statements using `and`
+
+ℹ Suggested fix
+162 162 | def f():
+163 163 |     if a:
+164 164 |         pass
+165     |-    elif b:
+166     |-        if c:
+167     |-            d
+    165 |+    elif b and c:
+    166 |+        d
+