Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add DeepSeek to SUPPORTED_PROVIDERS #1056

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 1, 2025

Conversation

winsonluk
Copy link
Contributor

This change adds deepseek:deepseek-chat, which is the latest DeepSeek-V3 model (released December 26, 2024).

DeepSeek doesn't have its own LangChain, so official DeepSeek documentation suggests using OpenAI's LangChain (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/faq), which this change implements.

Confirmed working with FAST_LLM="deepseek:deepseek-chat", SMART_LLM="deepseek:deepseek-chat", and STRATEGIC_LLM="deepseek:deepseek-chat" when DEEPSEEK_API_KEY system variable is set.

@winsonluk
Copy link
Contributor Author

@assafelovic this adds DeepSeek as an additional provider since their DeepSeek-V3 benchmarks are pretty impressive

Copy link
Owner

@assafelovic assafelovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love this! How's the model performance?

@assafelovic assafelovic merged commit 9fb1b75 into assafelovic:master Jan 1, 2025
@winsonluk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Love this! How's the model performance?

@assafelovic so far so good! I'm integrating it into https://ithy.com

It's a perfect candidate for FAST_LLM (faster and cheaper than 4o-mini / 3.5 Haiku / 1.5 Flash). When used as SMART_LLM or STRATEGIC_LLM, performance even exceeds most frontier models (though it starts to underperform when context tokens get very large).

My only concern is that they don't have published rate limits, but I haven't gotten any 429s so far 🤞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants