Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove js_image_layer bazel5 legacy symlink detection #1610

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 7, 2024

Conversation

jbedard
Copy link
Member

@jbedard jbedard commented Apr 6, 2024

Type of change

  • Refactor (a code change that neither fixes a bug or adds a new feature)

Test plan

  • Covered by existing test cases

@jbedard jbedard force-pushed the 2x-rm-symlink-detection branch from ee9a5cf to 6886a04 Compare April 6, 2024 22:42
@jbedard jbedard marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2024 00:29
@jbedard jbedard requested review from thesayyn and gregmagolan April 7, 2024 00:29
Copy link
Member

@thesayyn thesayyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you need to update rule impl as well

@jbedard jbedard force-pushed the 2x-rm-symlink-detection branch from 6886a04 to 48af645 Compare April 7, 2024 00:35
@jbedard
Copy link
Member Author

jbedard commented Apr 7, 2024

you need to update rule impl as well

Good point, thanks! (and updated...)

@jbedard jbedard force-pushed the 2x-rm-symlink-detection branch from 48af645 to 981c67e Compare April 7, 2024 01:27
Copy link
Member

@gregmagolan gregmagolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🌮

@jbedard jbedard merged commit caac704 into aspect-build:2.x Apr 7, 2024
91 checks passed
@gregmagolan gregmagolan mentioned this pull request Apr 29, 2024
21 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants